Argan Inc (AGX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Argan Inc (AGX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $172.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($724.09 Million) in one year. See AGX free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Argan Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Argan Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Argan Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Argan Inc (1992–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Argan Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Argan Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.57x | $414.72 Million | $724.09 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2025 | 0.35x | $167.58 Million | $484.37 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2024 | 0.38x | $116.86 Million | $307.29 Million | ▲ +363.9% |
| 2023 | -0.14x | $-30.06 Million | $208.59 Million | ▼ -215.6% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $28.41 Million | $227.99 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2021 | 0.62x | $174.68 Million | $280.22 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $53.56 Million | $146.51 Million | ▲ +126.8% |
| 2019 | -1.37x | $-112.32 Million | $82.28 Million | ▼ -246.1% |
| 2018 | -0.39x | $-72.79 Million | $184.54 Million | ▼ -153.6% |
| 2017 | 0.74x | $259.04 Million | $351.92 Million | ▲ +511.8% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | $-33.60 Million | $187.94 Million | ▼ -141.4% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | $93.33 Million | $216.24 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2014 | 0.60x | $98.98 Million | $165.53 Million | ▲ +118.9% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $31.56 Million | $115.56 Million | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2012 | 0.75x | $78.72 Million | $104.29 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $19.34 Million | $32.90 Million | ▲ +244.8% |
| 2010 | -0.41x | $-12.95 Million | $31.91 Million | ▼ -98.5% |
| 2009 | -0.20x | $-11.47 Million | $56.06 Million | ▼ -150.1% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $42.50 Million | $104.00 Million | ▲ +335.5% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-13.30 Million | $76.62 Million | ▼ -189.2% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $2.32 Million | $11.94 Million | ▲ +185.8% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | $-2.21 Million | $9.76 Million | ▼ -216.5% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-278.00K | $3.88 Million | ▼ -111.6% |
| 2003 | 0.62x | $519.67K | $838.00K | ▲ +122.7% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $409.72K | $1.47 Million | ▲ +1067.9% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $38.32K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2000 | -0.68x | $-988.13K | $1.44 Million | ▼ -228.3% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | $868.38K | $1.63 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 1998 | 0.62x | $656.48K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $338.82K | $605.88K | ▲ +22.7% |
| 1996 | 0.46x | $1.31 Million | $2.88 Million | ▲ +2379.6% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $5.00 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1993 | -0.34x | $-2.10 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -909.0% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $200.00K | $4.70 Million | — |