Argan Inc (AGX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Argan Inc (AGX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $113.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($812.93 Million) in one year. Check AGX cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Argan Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Argan Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Argan Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Argan Inc (1992–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Argan Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Argan Inc (AGX) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.57x | $414.72 Million | $724.09 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2025 | 0.35x | $167.58 Million | $484.37 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2024 | 0.38x | $116.86 Million | $307.29 Million | ▲ +363.9% |
| 2023 | -0.14x | $-30.06 Million | $208.59 Million | ▼ -215.6% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $28.41 Million | $227.99 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2021 | 0.62x | $174.68 Million | $280.22 Million | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $53.56 Million | $146.51 Million | ▲ +126.8% |
| 2019 | -1.37x | $-112.32 Million | $82.28 Million | ▼ -246.1% |
| 2018 | -0.39x | $-72.79 Million | $184.54 Million | ▼ -153.6% |
| 2017 | 0.74x | $259.04 Million | $351.92 Million | ▲ +511.8% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | $-33.60 Million | $187.94 Million | ▼ -141.4% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | $93.33 Million | $216.24 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2014 | 0.60x | $98.98 Million | $165.53 Million | ▲ +118.9% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $31.56 Million | $115.56 Million | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2012 | 0.75x | $78.72 Million | $104.29 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $19.34 Million | $32.90 Million | ▲ +244.8% |
| 2010 | -0.41x | $-12.95 Million | $31.91 Million | ▼ -98.5% |
| 2009 | -0.20x | $-11.47 Million | $56.06 Million | ▼ -150.1% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $42.50 Million | $104.00 Million | ▲ +335.5% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-13.30 Million | $76.62 Million | ▼ -189.2% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $2.32 Million | $11.94 Million | ▲ +185.8% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | $-2.21 Million | $9.76 Million | ▼ -216.5% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-278.00K | $3.88 Million | ▼ -111.6% |
| 2003 | 0.62x | $519.67K | $838.00K | ▲ +122.7% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $409.72K | $1.47 Million | ▲ +1067.9% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $38.32K | $1.61 Million | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2000 | -0.68x | $-988.13K | $1.44 Million | ▼ -228.3% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | $868.38K | $1.63 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 1998 | 0.62x | $656.48K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $338.82K | $605.88K | ▲ +22.7% |
| 1996 | 0.46x | $1.31 Million | $2.88 Million | ▲ +2379.6% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $5.00 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1993 | -0.34x | $-2.10 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -909.0% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $200.00K | $4.70 Million | — |