Ametek Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ametek Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ametek Inc (AME) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $440.87 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.66 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Ametek Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ametek Inc (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ametek Inc from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ametek Inc across 36 annual periods. Check Ametek Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Ametek Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Ametek Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ametek Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Ametek Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.37x | $1.83 Billion | $4.98 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $1.74 Billion | $6.29 Billion | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $1.15 Billion | $4.95 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $1.16 Billion | $5.03 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $1.28 Billion | $4.41 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $1.11 Billion | $4.73 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $925.52 Million | $4.42 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $833.26 Million | $3.77 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $756.84 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $672.54 Million | $3.41 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $725.96 Million | $3.17 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $660.66 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $612.46 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $508.56 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $423.01 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | $364.67 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $247.26 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $278.52 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $225.97 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $165.86 Million | $975.05 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $161.28 Million | $760.77 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $154.90 Million | $685.72 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $103.66 Million | $609.83 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $56.13 Million | $694.23 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $79.72 Million | $578.15 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $130.57 Million | $551.93 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 1998 | 0.15x | $78.39 Million | $525.78 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $71.30 Million | $396.20 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $74.70 Million | $399.40 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $65.40 Million | $439.60 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $111.70 Million | $428.80 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | $65.30 Million | $397.40 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $78.60 Million | $384.40 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 1991 | 0.21x | $83.20 Million | $401.00 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 1990 | 0.21x | $86.80 Million | $415.80 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 1989 | 0.16x | $60.10 Million | $368.40 Million | — |