Artivion Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Artivion Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Artivion Inc (AORT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($626.35 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Artivion Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Artivion Inc (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Artivion Inc from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Artivion Inc across 34 annual periods. Check Artivion Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Artivion Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Artivion Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Artivion Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AORT cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $38.13 Million | $436.56 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | $22.24 Million | $512.90 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $18.82 Million | $510.62 Million | ▲ +442.3% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-5.15 Million | $478.47 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-2.58 Million | $492.32 Million | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $12.37 Million | $460.69 Million | ▼ -45.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $15.83 Million | $319.96 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $9.88 Million | $296.02 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $10.80 Million | $312.63 Million | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $19.72 Million | $107.16 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 2015 | 0.44x | $11.44 Million | $25.93 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $8.12 Million | $27.47 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2013 | 0.56x | $16.77 Million | $29.94 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2012 | 0.65x | $18.99 Million | $29.04 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2011 | 0.64x | $16.75 Million | $26.33 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2010 | 0.89x | $20.84 Million | $23.50 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2009 | 0.71x | $16.57 Million | $23.41 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $9.54 Million | $26.67 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $9.29 Million | $30.06 Million | ▲ +901.8% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-1.07 Million | $27.78 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2005 | -0.71x | $-18.52 Million | $26.19 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2004 | -0.69x | $-16.23 Million | $23.60 Million | ▼ -209.3% |
| 2003 | -0.22x | $-5.93 Million | $26.69 Million | ▼ -180.2% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | $-2.11 Million | $26.61 Million | ▼ -134.1% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $6.48 Million | $27.87 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $10.28 Million | $22.61 Million | ▲ +535.5% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $987.00K | $13.80 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $1.20 Million | $18.00 Million | ▲ +171.2% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-2.20 Million | $23.50 Million | ▼ -123.6% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $4.00 Million | $10.10 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $1.10 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 1994 | 0.74x | $2.60 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +230.0% |
| 1993 | -0.57x | $-2.00 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 1991 | -0.53x | $-2.30 Million | $4.30 Million | — |