Artivion Inc (AORT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Artivion Inc (AORT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($432.69 Million) in one year. See AORT cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Artivion Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Artivion Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Artivion Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Artivion Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Artivion Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Artivion Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $38.13 Million | $436.56 Million | ▲ +101.5% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | $22.24 Million | $512.90 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $18.82 Million | $510.62 Million | ▲ +442.3% |
| 2022 | -0.01x | $-5.15 Million | $478.47 Million | ▼ -105.1% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | $-2.58 Million | $492.32 Million | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $12.37 Million | $460.69 Million | ▼ -45.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $15.83 Million | $319.96 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $9.88 Million | $296.02 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $10.80 Million | $312.63 Million | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $19.72 Million | $107.16 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 2015 | 0.44x | $11.44 Million | $25.93 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2014 | 0.30x | $8.12 Million | $27.47 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2013 | 0.56x | $16.77 Million | $29.94 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2012 | 0.65x | $18.99 Million | $29.04 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2011 | 0.64x | $16.75 Million | $26.33 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2010 | 0.89x | $20.84 Million | $23.50 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2009 | 0.71x | $16.57 Million | $23.41 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $9.54 Million | $26.67 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $9.29 Million | $30.06 Million | ▲ +901.8% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-1.07 Million | $27.78 Million | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2005 | -0.71x | $-18.52 Million | $26.19 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2004 | -0.69x | $-16.23 Million | $23.60 Million | ▼ -209.3% |
| 2003 | -0.22x | $-5.93 Million | $26.69 Million | ▼ -180.2% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | $-2.11 Million | $26.61 Million | ▼ -134.1% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $6.48 Million | $27.87 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $10.28 Million | $22.61 Million | ▲ +535.5% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $987.00K | $13.80 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $1.20 Million | $18.00 Million | ▲ +171.2% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-2.20 Million | $23.50 Million | ▼ -123.6% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $4.00 Million | $10.10 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 1995 | 0.35x | $1.10 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 1994 | 0.74x | $2.60 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +230.0% |
| 1993 | -0.57x | $-2.00 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 1991 | -0.53x | $-2.30 Million | $4.30 Million | — |