Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $260.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.74 Billion) in one year. See ATI FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Allegheny Technologies Incorporated generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated. Check ATI cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | $614.30 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $407.20 Million | $3.28 Billion | ▲ +407.2% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $85.90 Million | $3.50 Billion | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $224.90 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +1366.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $16.10 Million | $3.45 Billion | ▼ -90.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $166.90 Million | $3.39 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $230.10 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $392.80 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +1569.0% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $22.40 Million | $3.34 Billion | ▲ +157.2% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-43.70 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $131.40 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▲ +155.6% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $55.90 Million | $3.88 Billion | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $368.40 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $427.50 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $296.80 Million | $3.48 Billion | ▲ +645.1% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $27.10 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $218.50 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $754.50 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | $709.80 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $308.50 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $222.60 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +803.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $24.10 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $82.00 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $204.20 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $122.80 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $135.50 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $72.20 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -78.6% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $399.40 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | $256.70 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +22.4% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $226.80 Million | $1.73 Billion | — |