Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $315.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.18 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated across 30 annual periods. Also explore Allegheny Technologies Incorporated asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Allegheny Technologies Incorporated worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | $614.30 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $407.20 Million | $3.28 Billion | ▲ +407.2% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $85.90 Million | $3.50 Billion | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $224.90 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +1366.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $16.10 Million | $3.45 Billion | ▼ -90.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $166.90 Million | $3.39 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $230.10 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $392.80 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +1569.0% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $22.40 Million | $3.34 Billion | ▲ +157.2% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-43.70 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $131.40 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▲ +155.6% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $55.90 Million | $3.88 Billion | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $368.40 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $427.50 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $296.80 Million | $3.48 Billion | ▲ +645.1% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $27.10 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $218.50 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $754.50 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | $709.80 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $308.50 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $222.60 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +803.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $24.10 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $82.00 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $204.20 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $122.80 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $135.50 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $72.20 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -78.6% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $399.40 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | $256.70 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +22.4% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $226.80 Million | $1.73 Billion | — |