Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $315.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.18 Billion) in one year. See ATI free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated across 30 annual periods. Also explore ATI shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Allegheny Technologies Incorporated market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | $614.30 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $407.20 Million | $3.28 Billion | ▲ +407.2% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $85.90 Million | $3.50 Billion | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $224.90 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▲ +1366.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $16.10 Million | $3.45 Billion | ▼ -90.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $166.90 Million | $3.39 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $230.10 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $392.80 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +1569.0% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $22.40 Million | $3.34 Billion | ▲ +157.2% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-43.70 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -131.8% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $131.40 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▲ +155.6% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $55.90 Million | $3.88 Billion | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | $368.40 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $427.50 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $296.80 Million | $3.48 Billion | ▲ +645.1% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $27.10 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $218.50 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $754.50 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2007 | 0.38x | $709.80 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $308.50 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $222.60 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +803.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $24.10 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $82.00 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $204.20 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $122.80 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $135.50 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $72.20 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -78.6% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $399.40 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | $256.70 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +22.4% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $226.80 Million | $1.73 Billion | — |