Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $723.49 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.44 Billion) in one year. See ATO cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Atmos Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Atmos Energy Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Atmos Energy Corporation growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Atmos Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Atmos Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ATO market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $2.05 Billion | $15.35 Billion | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $1.73 Billion | $13.04 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $3.46 Billion | $11.65 Billion | ▲ +288.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $977.58 Million | $12.77 Billion | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-1.08 Billion | $11.70 Billion | ▼ -176.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $1.04 Billion | $8.57 Billion | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $968.77 Million | $7.62 Billion | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $1.12 Billion | $7.10 Billion | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $867.09 Million | $6.85 Billion | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $794.99 Million | $6.55 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $836.52 Million | $5.88 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $739.99 Million | $5.51 Billion | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $613.13 Million | $5.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $586.92 Million | $5.14 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $582.84 Million | $5.03 Billion | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $726.48 Million | $4.59 Billion | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | $919.23 Million | $4.19 Billion | ▲ +156.3% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $370.93 Million | $4.33 Billion | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $547.10 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $311.45 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $386.94 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $270.73 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +444.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $49.45 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $296.23 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +268.4% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $83.00 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $54.20 Million | $956.29 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $84.70 Million | $852.80 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $91.70 Million | $770.20 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $68.70 Million | $761.00 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $64.50 Million | $681.00 Million | ▼ -53.4% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $58.50 Million | $287.60 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $41.20 Million | $267.10 Million | — |