Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $723.49 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.44 Billion) in one year. See Atmos Energy Corporation financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Atmos Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Atmos Energy Corporation across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ATO cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Atmos Energy Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Atmos Energy Corporation. Check Atmos Energy Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $2.05 Billion | $15.35 Billion | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $1.73 Billion | $13.04 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $3.46 Billion | $11.65 Billion | ▲ +288.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $977.58 Million | $12.77 Billion | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-1.08 Billion | $11.70 Billion | ▼ -176.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $1.04 Billion | $8.57 Billion | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $968.77 Million | $7.62 Billion | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $1.12 Billion | $7.10 Billion | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $867.09 Million | $6.85 Billion | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $794.99 Million | $6.55 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $836.52 Million | $5.88 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $739.99 Million | $5.51 Billion | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $613.13 Million | $5.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $586.92 Million | $5.14 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $582.84 Million | $5.03 Billion | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $726.48 Million | $4.59 Billion | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | $919.23 Million | $4.19 Billion | ▲ +156.3% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $370.93 Million | $4.33 Billion | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $547.10 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $311.45 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $386.94 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | $270.73 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +444.0% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $49.45 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $296.23 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +268.4% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $83.00 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $54.20 Million | $956.29 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $84.70 Million | $852.80 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $91.70 Million | $770.20 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $68.70 Million | $761.00 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $64.50 Million | $681.00 Million | ▼ -53.4% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $58.50 Million | $287.60 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $41.20 Million | $267.10 Million | — |