BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund (BFZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund (BFZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of July 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-20.49 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($275.83 Million) in one year. See BlackRock California Municipal Income Cl (BFZ) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund across 16 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of BlackRock California Municipal Income Cl to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund (2007–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of BlackRock California Municipal Income Cl.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-12.20 Million | $275.83 Million | ▼ -152.9% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $17.60 Million | $210.43 Million | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2023 | 325.89x | $88.17 Million | $270.55K | ▲ +135424.9% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $65.79 Million | $273.58 Million | ▲ +320.7% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $18.13 Million | $317.14 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $32.05 Million | $316.79 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $23.94 Million | $361.93 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $34.33 Million | $350.94 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $38.03 Million | $350.71 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $30.21 Million | $364.90 Million | ▲ +230.6% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-21.27 Million | $335.58 Million | ▼ -123.4% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $81.60 Million | $300.91 Million | ▲ +176.4% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $32.68 Million | $333.09 Million | ▼ -69.7% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $19.04 Million | $58.71 Million | ▲ +969.8% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | $-1.21 Million | $32.54 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2007 | 1.22x | $2.14 Million | $1.75 Million | — |