BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund (BFZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund (BFZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of July 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-20.49 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($275.83 Million) in one year. See BFZ financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund across 16 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BlackRock California Municipal Income Cl operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund (2007–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BlackRock California Municipal Income Closed Fund. Check BFZ cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-12.20 Million | $275.83 Million | ▼ -152.9% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $17.60 Million | $210.43 Million | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2023 | 325.89x | $88.17 Million | $270.55K | ▲ +135424.9% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $65.79 Million | $273.58 Million | ▲ +320.7% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $18.13 Million | $317.14 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $32.05 Million | $316.79 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $23.94 Million | $361.93 Million | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $34.33 Million | $350.94 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $38.03 Million | $350.71 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $30.21 Million | $364.90 Million | ▲ +230.6% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-21.27 Million | $335.58 Million | ▼ -123.4% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $81.60 Million | $300.91 Million | ▲ +176.4% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $32.68 Million | $333.09 Million | ▼ -69.7% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $19.04 Million | $58.71 Million | ▲ +969.8% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | $-1.21 Million | $32.54 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2007 | 1.22x | $2.14 Million | $1.75 Million | — |