Badger Meter Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Badger Meter Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Badger Meter Inc (BMI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $26.61 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($315.29 Million) in one year. Check Badger Meter Inc (BMI) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Badger Meter Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Badger Meter Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Badger Meter Inc across 37 annual periods. Check Badger Meter Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Badger Meter Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Badger Meter Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Badger Meter Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Badger Meter Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.71x | $183.70 Million | $260.28 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $155.03 Million | $210.18 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | $110.12 Million | $200.44 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2022 | 0.51x | $82.45 Million | $160.62 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2021 | 0.69x | $87.51 Million | $127.75 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2020 | 0.81x | $89.58 Million | $109.96 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.89x | $80.71 Million | $90.83 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | $60.35 Million | $89.19 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2017 | 0.44x | $49.75 Million | $114.28 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2016 | 0.60x | $56.19 Million | $93.49 Million | ▲ +106.6% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $35.83 Million | $123.20 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $35.73 Million | $126.83 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $34.82 Million | $119.50 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $34.80 Million | $119.21 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2011 | 0.79x | $31.32 Million | $39.63 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | $18.40 Million | $47.48 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2009 | 0.79x | $36.59 Million | $46.55 Million | ▲ +145.0% |
| 2008 | 0.32x | $27.05 Million | $84.33 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2007 | 0.48x | $28.27 Million | $58.33 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $16.75 Million | $67.56 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $18.36 Million | $72.45 Million | ▲ +263.7% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $5.50 Million | $78.89 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $14.08 Million | $78.68 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $12.23 Million | $78.37 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $8.59 Million | $58.37 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $13.25 Million | $54.70 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 1999 | 0.26x | $15.40 Million | $60.10 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $14.70 Million | $49.10 Million | ▲ +134.9% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $5.20 Million | $40.80 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $9.90 Million | $29.50 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1995 | 0.42x | $12.00 Million | $28.30 Million | ▲ +119.4% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $6.30 Million | $32.60 Million | ▲ +102.9% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $3.00 Million | $31.50 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $3.80 Million | $29.00 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1991 | 0.25x | $5.40 Million | $21.90 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 1990 | 0.23x | $5.10 Million | $22.50 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1989 | 0.16x | $3.30 Million | $20.80 Million | — |