Badger Meter Inc (BMI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Badger Meter Inc (BMI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.21x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $54.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($260.28 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Badger Meter Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Badger Meter Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Badger Meter Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore BMI year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Badger Meter Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Badger Meter Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Badger Meter Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.71x | $183.70 Million | $260.28 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2024 | 0.74x | $155.03 Million | $210.18 Million | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2023 | 0.55x | $110.12 Million | $200.44 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2022 | 0.51x | $82.45 Million | $160.62 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2021 | 0.69x | $87.51 Million | $127.75 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2020 | 0.81x | $89.58 Million | $109.96 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.89x | $80.71 Million | $90.83 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2018 | 0.68x | $60.35 Million | $89.19 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2017 | 0.44x | $49.75 Million | $114.28 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2016 | 0.60x | $56.19 Million | $93.49 Million | ▲ +106.6% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $35.83 Million | $123.20 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $35.73 Million | $126.83 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $34.82 Million | $119.50 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $34.80 Million | $119.21 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2011 | 0.79x | $31.32 Million | $39.63 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | $18.40 Million | $47.48 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2009 | 0.79x | $36.59 Million | $46.55 Million | ▲ +145.0% |
| 2008 | 0.32x | $27.05 Million | $84.33 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2007 | 0.48x | $28.27 Million | $58.33 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $16.75 Million | $67.56 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $18.36 Million | $72.45 Million | ▲ +263.7% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $5.50 Million | $78.89 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $14.08 Million | $78.68 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $12.23 Million | $78.37 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | $8.59 Million | $58.37 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $13.25 Million | $54.70 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 1999 | 0.26x | $15.40 Million | $60.10 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $14.70 Million | $49.10 Million | ▲ +134.9% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $5.20 Million | $40.80 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 1996 | 0.34x | $9.90 Million | $29.50 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1995 | 0.42x | $12.00 Million | $28.30 Million | ▲ +119.4% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $6.30 Million | $32.60 Million | ▲ +102.9% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $3.00 Million | $31.50 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $3.80 Million | $29.00 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1991 | 0.25x | $5.40 Million | $21.90 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 1990 | 0.23x | $5.10 Million | $22.50 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1989 | 0.16x | $3.30 Million | $20.80 Million | — |