BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.89x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-289.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($325.00K) in one year. Check earnings quality score of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (1992–2023)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust from 1992 to 2023. Historical debt coverage capacity for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. Check BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2023)
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2023. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 16.40x | $5.54 Million | $338.00K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2022 | 289.19x | $80.97 Million | $280.00K | ▲ +1287.6% |
| 2021 | 20.84x | $7.59 Million | $364.00K | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2020 | 39.81x | $8.24 Million | $207.00K | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2019 | 189.75x | $48.01 Million | $253.00K | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 333.83x | $113.17 Million | $339.00K | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2017 | 339.34x | $77.03 Million | $227.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2016 | 200.25x | $43.66 Million | $218.00K | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2015 | 497.53x | $125.38 Million | $252.00K | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2014 | 1341.62x | $226.73 Million | $169.00K | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 1402.17x | $193.50 Million | $138.00K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2012 | 1136.00x | $198.80 Million | $175.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2011 | 1571.09x | $201.10 Million | $128.00K | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2010 | 1312.76x | $182.47 Million | $139.00K | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2009 | 739.77x | $156.09 Million | $211.00K | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2008 | 893.97x | $248.53 Million | $278.00K | ▲ +128.3% |
| 2007 | 391.54x | $173.45 Million | $443.00K | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2006 | 952.15x | $181.86 Million | $191.00K | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2005 | 842.15x | $149.90 Million | $178.00K | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2004 | 466.98x | $79.85 Million | $171.00K | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2003 | 168.03x | $53.10 Million | $316.00K | ▲ +231.3% |
| 2002 | 50.72x | $30.18 Million | $595.00K | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2001 | 109.61x | $57.21 Million | $522.00K | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2000 | 133.36x | $61.88 Million | $464.00K | ▲ +538.1% |
| 1999 | 20.90x | $9.82 Million | $470.00K | ▲ +101.1% |
| 1998 | -1973.35x | $-203.25 Million | $103.00K | ▼ -2280.6% |
| 1997 | 90.50x | $17.65 Million | $195.00K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1996 | 65.66x | $5.91 Million | $90.00K | ▲ +670.1% |
| 1995 | -11.52x | $-1.45 Million | $126.00K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 1994 | -297.64x | $-35.12 Million | $118.00K | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1992 | 648.00x | $64.80 Million | $100.00K | — |