BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.89x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-289.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($325.00K) in one year. See BPT financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2023)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (1992–2023)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. Check cash flow quality index of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 16.40x | $5.54 Million | $338.00K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2022 | 289.19x | $80.97 Million | $280.00K | ▲ +1287.6% |
| 2021 | 20.84x | $7.59 Million | $364.00K | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2020 | 39.81x | $8.24 Million | $207.00K | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2019 | 189.75x | $48.01 Million | $253.00K | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 333.83x | $113.17 Million | $339.00K | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2017 | 339.34x | $77.03 Million | $227.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2016 | 200.25x | $43.66 Million | $218.00K | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2015 | 497.53x | $125.38 Million | $252.00K | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2014 | 1341.62x | $226.73 Million | $169.00K | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 1402.17x | $193.50 Million | $138.00K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2012 | 1136.00x | $198.80 Million | $175.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2011 | 1571.09x | $201.10 Million | $128.00K | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2010 | 1312.76x | $182.47 Million | $139.00K | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2009 | 739.77x | $156.09 Million | $211.00K | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2008 | 893.97x | $248.53 Million | $278.00K | ▲ +128.3% |
| 2007 | 391.54x | $173.45 Million | $443.00K | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2006 | 952.15x | $181.86 Million | $191.00K | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2005 | 842.15x | $149.90 Million | $178.00K | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2004 | 466.98x | $79.85 Million | $171.00K | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2003 | 168.03x | $53.10 Million | $316.00K | ▲ +231.3% |
| 2002 | 50.72x | $30.18 Million | $595.00K | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2001 | 109.61x | $57.21 Million | $522.00K | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2000 | 133.36x | $61.88 Million | $464.00K | ▲ +538.1% |
| 1999 | 20.90x | $9.82 Million | $470.00K | ▲ +101.1% |
| 1998 | -1973.35x | $-203.25 Million | $103.00K | ▼ -2280.6% |
| 1997 | 90.50x | $17.65 Million | $195.00K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1996 | 65.66x | $5.91 Million | $90.00K | ▲ +670.1% |
| 1995 | -11.52x | $-1.45 Million | $126.00K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 1994 | -297.64x | $-35.12 Million | $118.00K | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1992 | 648.00x | $64.80 Million | $100.00K | — |