BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.89x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-289.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($325.00K) in one year. See BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2023)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. Also explore BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (1992–2023)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BPT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 16.40x | $5.54 Million | $338.00K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2022 | 289.19x | $80.97 Million | $280.00K | ▲ +1287.6% |
| 2021 | 20.84x | $7.59 Million | $364.00K | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2020 | 39.81x | $8.24 Million | $207.00K | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2019 | 189.75x | $48.01 Million | $253.00K | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 333.83x | $113.17 Million | $339.00K | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2017 | 339.34x | $77.03 Million | $227.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2016 | 200.25x | $43.66 Million | $218.00K | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2015 | 497.53x | $125.38 Million | $252.00K | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2014 | 1341.62x | $226.73 Million | $169.00K | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 1402.17x | $193.50 Million | $138.00K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2012 | 1136.00x | $198.80 Million | $175.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2011 | 1571.09x | $201.10 Million | $128.00K | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2010 | 1312.76x | $182.47 Million | $139.00K | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2009 | 739.77x | $156.09 Million | $211.00K | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2008 | 893.97x | $248.53 Million | $278.00K | ▲ +128.3% |
| 2007 | 391.54x | $173.45 Million | $443.00K | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2006 | 952.15x | $181.86 Million | $191.00K | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2005 | 842.15x | $149.90 Million | $178.00K | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2004 | 466.98x | $79.85 Million | $171.00K | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2003 | 168.03x | $53.10 Million | $316.00K | ▲ +231.3% |
| 2002 | 50.72x | $30.18 Million | $595.00K | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2001 | 109.61x | $57.21 Million | $522.00K | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2000 | 133.36x | $61.88 Million | $464.00K | ▲ +538.1% |
| 1999 | 20.90x | $9.82 Million | $470.00K | ▲ +101.1% |
| 1998 | -1973.35x | $-203.25 Million | $103.00K | ▼ -2280.6% |
| 1997 | 90.50x | $17.65 Million | $195.00K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1996 | 65.66x | $5.91 Million | $90.00K | ▲ +670.1% |
| 1995 | -11.52x | $-1.45 Million | $126.00K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 1994 | -297.64x | $-35.12 Million | $118.00K | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1992 | 648.00x | $64.80 Million | $100.00K | — |