BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.89x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-289.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($325.00K) in one year. Check BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2023)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust across 31 annual periods. Also explore total assets of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (1992–2023)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 16.40x | $5.54 Million | $338.00K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2022 | 289.19x | $80.97 Million | $280.00K | ▲ +1287.6% |
| 2021 | 20.84x | $7.59 Million | $364.00K | ▼ -47.6% |
| 2020 | 39.81x | $8.24 Million | $207.00K | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2019 | 189.75x | $48.01 Million | $253.00K | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 333.83x | $113.17 Million | $339.00K | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2017 | 339.34x | $77.03 Million | $227.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2016 | 200.25x | $43.66 Million | $218.00K | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2015 | 497.53x | $125.38 Million | $252.00K | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2014 | 1341.62x | $226.73 Million | $169.00K | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2013 | 1402.17x | $193.50 Million | $138.00K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2012 | 1136.00x | $198.80 Million | $175.00K | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2011 | 1571.09x | $201.10 Million | $128.00K | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2010 | 1312.76x | $182.47 Million | $139.00K | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2009 | 739.77x | $156.09 Million | $211.00K | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2008 | 893.97x | $248.53 Million | $278.00K | ▲ +128.3% |
| 2007 | 391.54x | $173.45 Million | $443.00K | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2006 | 952.15x | $181.86 Million | $191.00K | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2005 | 842.15x | $149.90 Million | $178.00K | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2004 | 466.98x | $79.85 Million | $171.00K | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2003 | 168.03x | $53.10 Million | $316.00K | ▲ +231.3% |
| 2002 | 50.72x | $30.18 Million | $595.00K | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2001 | 109.61x | $57.21 Million | $522.00K | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2000 | 133.36x | $61.88 Million | $464.00K | ▲ +538.1% |
| 1999 | 20.90x | $9.82 Million | $470.00K | ▲ +101.1% |
| 1998 | -1973.35x | $-203.25 Million | $103.00K | ▼ -2280.6% |
| 1997 | 90.50x | $17.65 Million | $195.00K | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1996 | 65.66x | $5.91 Million | $90.00K | ▲ +670.1% |
| 1995 | -11.52x | $-1.45 Million | $126.00K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 1994 | -297.64x | $-35.12 Million | $118.00K | ▼ -145.9% |
| 1992 | 648.00x | $64.80 Million | $100.00K | — |