BRT Realty Trust (BRT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BRT Realty Trust (BRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($529.25 Million) in one year. Explore BRT Realty Trust (BRT) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BRT Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BRT Realty Trust across 35 annual periods. Also explore BRT Realty Trust assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BRT Realty Trust (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BRT Realty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BRT stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $14.10 Million | $532.61 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $24.14 Million | $508.55 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $19.61 Million | $481.52 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $15.03 Million | $482.05 Million | ▲ +1611.8% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-529.00K | $256.59 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-1.75 Million | $188.05 Million | ▼ -120.6% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $8.65 Million | $191.05 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $38.59 Million | $856.88 Million | ▲ +160.5% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $13.09 Million | $757.19 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $10.08 Million | $673.22 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $8.41 Million | $675.71 Million | ▲ +245.6% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-4.83 Million | $565.98 Million | ▼ -528.5% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $766.00K | $384.23 Million | ▲ +106.4% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-7.48 Million | $238.94 Million | ▼ -220.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $1.44 Million | $55.28 Million | ▲ +125.8% |
| 2010 | -0.10x | $-5.71 Million | $56.43 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2009 | -0.11x | $-7.43 Million | $67.12 Million | ▼ -408.9% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $2.98 Million | $83.13 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | $21.20 Million | $92.93 Million | ▲ +145.9% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $19.85 Million | $213.99 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $14.21 Million | $123.54 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $11.23 Million | $65.94 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2003 | 0.70x | $8.81 Million | $12.61 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $10.71 Million | $20.64 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2001 | 0.94x | $7.68 Million | $8.14 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2000 | 1.59x | $5.26 Million | $3.31 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1999 | 1.48x | $5.90 Million | $3.98 Million | ▲ +523.3% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $3.82 Million | $16.07 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $7.37 Million | $13.78 Million | ▲ +617.1% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $2.14 Million | $28.72 Million | ▲ +370.0% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $741.00K | $46.70 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $3.03 Million | $76.44 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 1993 | 0.04x | $4.10 Million | $107.10 Million | ▲ +225.0% |
| 1992 | -0.03x | $-3.70 Million | $120.80 Million | ▼ -348.5% |
| 1991 | -0.01x | $-900.00K | $131.80 Million | — |