BRT Realty Trust (BRT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BRT Realty Trust (BRT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($529.25 Million) in one year. See BRT Realty Trust (BRT) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BRT Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BRT Realty Trust across 35 annual periods. Also explore BRT net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BRT Realty Trust (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BRT Realty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BRT Realty Trust market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $14.10 Million | $532.61 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $24.14 Million | $508.55 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $19.61 Million | $481.52 Million | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $15.03 Million | $482.05 Million | ▲ +1611.8% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-529.00K | $256.59 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-1.75 Million | $188.05 Million | ▼ -120.6% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $8.65 Million | $191.05 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $38.59 Million | $856.88 Million | ▲ +160.5% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $13.09 Million | $757.19 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $10.08 Million | $673.22 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $8.41 Million | $675.71 Million | ▲ +245.6% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-4.83 Million | $565.98 Million | ▼ -528.5% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $766.00K | $384.23 Million | ▲ +106.4% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-7.48 Million | $238.94 Million | ▼ -220.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $1.44 Million | $55.28 Million | ▲ +125.8% |
| 2010 | -0.10x | $-5.71 Million | $56.43 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2009 | -0.11x | $-7.43 Million | $67.12 Million | ▼ -408.9% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $2.98 Million | $83.13 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | $21.20 Million | $92.93 Million | ▲ +145.9% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $19.85 Million | $213.99 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $14.21 Million | $123.54 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $11.23 Million | $65.94 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2003 | 0.70x | $8.81 Million | $12.61 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $10.71 Million | $20.64 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2001 | 0.94x | $7.68 Million | $8.14 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2000 | 1.59x | $5.26 Million | $3.31 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1999 | 1.48x | $5.90 Million | $3.98 Million | ▲ +523.3% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $3.82 Million | $16.07 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $7.37 Million | $13.78 Million | ▲ +617.1% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $2.14 Million | $28.72 Million | ▲ +370.0% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $741.00K | $46.70 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $3.03 Million | $76.44 Million | ▲ +3.5% |
| 1993 | 0.04x | $4.10 Million | $107.10 Million | ▲ +225.0% |
| 1992 | -0.03x | $-3.70 Million | $120.80 Million | ▼ -348.5% |
| 1991 | -0.01x | $-900.00K | $131.80 Million | — |