Caleres Inc (CAL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Caleres Inc (CAL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-27.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.40 Billion) in one year. See Caleres Inc (CAL) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Caleres Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Caleres Inc across 38 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Caleres Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Caleres Inc (1989–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Caleres Inc. Check Caleres Inc (CAL) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.07x | $100.26 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2025 | 0.08x | $104.56 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $200.15 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $125.88 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $168.44 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $126.35 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $170.79 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $129.59 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $191.38 Million | $770.45 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $183.62 Million | $860.79 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $149.15 Million | $700.85 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $118.81 Million | $675.19 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $104.03 Million | $672.04 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $197.94 Million | $745.36 Million | ▲ +349.4% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $48.09 Million | $813.76 Million | ▲ +1971.2% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $-2.31 Million | $732.13 Million | ▼ -101.7% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | $118.08 Million | $628.92 Million | ▲ +242.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $34.34 Million | $625.64 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $86.37 Million | $539.18 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2007 | 0.25x | $142.19 Million | $575.41 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $146.84 Million | $593.08 Million | ▲ +111.2% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $53.32 Million | $454.83 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | $87.75 Million | $364.20 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | $103.73 Million | $408.74 Million | ▲ +435.3% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $21.06 Million | $444.24 Million | ▲ +246.6% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $6.43 Million | $470.10 Million | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $39.14 Million | $400.39 Million | ▼ -45.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $78.90 Million | $438.00 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $58.70 Million | $495.80 Million | ▲ +1641.5% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $3.30 Million | $485.40 Million | ▼ -81.4% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $15.70 Million | $429.50 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $48.40 Million | $386.80 Million | ▲ +793.8% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-9.70 Million | $537.80 Million | ▼ -107.3% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-4.10 Million | $471.20 Million | ▼ -104.9% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $70.20 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1991 | 0.16x | $65.10 Million | $400.60 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 1990 | 0.11x | $39.60 Million | $374.00 Million | ▼ -4.6% |
| 1989 | 0.11x | $43.90 Million | $395.50 Million | — |