Caleres Inc (CAL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Caleres Inc (CAL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $59.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.36 Billion) in one year. Explore Caleres Inc (CAL) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Caleres Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Caleres Inc across 38 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Caleres Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Caleres Inc (1989–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Caleres Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Caleres Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.07x | $100.26 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2025 | 0.08x | $104.56 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $200.15 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $125.88 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $168.44 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $126.35 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $170.79 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $129.59 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $191.38 Million | $770.45 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $183.62 Million | $860.79 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $149.15 Million | $700.85 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $118.81 Million | $675.19 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $104.03 Million | $672.04 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $197.94 Million | $745.36 Million | ▲ +349.4% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $48.09 Million | $813.76 Million | ▲ +1971.2% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $-2.31 Million | $732.13 Million | ▼ -101.7% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | $118.08 Million | $628.92 Million | ▲ +242.1% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $34.34 Million | $625.64 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $86.37 Million | $539.18 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2007 | 0.25x | $142.19 Million | $575.41 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $146.84 Million | $593.08 Million | ▲ +111.2% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $53.32 Million | $454.83 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | $87.75 Million | $364.20 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | $103.73 Million | $408.74 Million | ▲ +435.3% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $21.06 Million | $444.24 Million | ▲ +246.6% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $6.43 Million | $470.10 Million | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $39.14 Million | $400.39 Million | ▼ -45.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $78.90 Million | $438.00 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $58.70 Million | $495.80 Million | ▲ +1641.5% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $3.30 Million | $485.40 Million | ▼ -81.4% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $15.70 Million | $429.50 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $48.40 Million | $386.80 Million | ▲ +793.8% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-9.70 Million | $537.80 Million | ▼ -107.3% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-4.10 Million | $471.20 Million | ▼ -104.9% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $70.20 Million | $391.80 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 1991 | 0.16x | $65.10 Million | $400.60 Million | ▲ +53.5% |
| 1990 | 0.11x | $39.60 Million | $374.00 Million | ▼ -4.6% |
| 1989 | 0.11x | $43.90 Million | $395.50 Million | — |