CONMED Corporation (CNMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CONMED Corporation (CNMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.30 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does CONMED Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CONMED Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CONMED Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore CONMED Corporation annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CONMED Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CONMED Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CNMD stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $170.69 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $166.97 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $125.35 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +297.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $33.37 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $111.77 Million | $980.58 Million | ▲ +84.2% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $64.53 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $95.13 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $74.70 Million | $706.87 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $65.57 Million | $726.53 Million | ▲ +76.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $38.22 Million | $748.41 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $48.07 Million | $527.87 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $65.18 Million | $516.90 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $80.95 Million | $484.19 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $95.20 Million | $477.46 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $102.99 Million | $362.52 Million | ▲ +196.6% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $38.24 Million | $399.21 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $25.03 Million | $380.99 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $61.15 Million | $399.93 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $65.89 Million | $388.95 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $64.57 Million | $421.22 Million | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $42.43 Million | $450.78 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $74.84 Million | $424.84 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $58.01 Million | $371.57 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $44.92 Million | $355.20 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $77.15 Million | $417.97 Million | ▲ +130.5% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $35.95 Million | $448.97 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $37.00 Million | $450.90 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $21.00 Million | $446.60 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $31.80 Million | $398.90 Million | ▼ -96.5% |
| 1996 | 2.25x | $25.90 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +1860.7% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $5.10 Million | $44.40 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 1994 | 0.44x | $8.30 Million | $19.00 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 1993 | 0.29x | $5.70 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 1992 | 1.13x | $3.60 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +245.5% |
| 1991 | 0.33x | $1.40 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -41.1% |
| 1990 | 0.55x | $5.20 Million | $9.40 Million | — |