CONMED Corporation (CNMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CONMED Corporation (CNMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.30 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of CONMED Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CONMED Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CONMED Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore CONMED Corporation total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CONMED Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CONMED Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CONMED Corporation (CNMD) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $170.69 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $166.97 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $125.35 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +297.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $33.37 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $111.77 Million | $980.58 Million | ▲ +84.2% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $64.53 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $95.13 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $74.70 Million | $706.87 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $65.57 Million | $726.53 Million | ▲ +76.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $38.22 Million | $748.41 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $48.07 Million | $527.87 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $65.18 Million | $516.90 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $80.95 Million | $484.19 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $95.20 Million | $477.46 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $102.99 Million | $362.52 Million | ▲ +196.6% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $38.24 Million | $399.21 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $25.03 Million | $380.99 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $61.15 Million | $399.93 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $65.89 Million | $388.95 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $64.57 Million | $421.22 Million | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $42.43 Million | $450.78 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $74.84 Million | $424.84 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $58.01 Million | $371.57 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $44.92 Million | $355.20 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $77.15 Million | $417.97 Million | ▲ +130.5% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $35.95 Million | $448.97 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $37.00 Million | $450.90 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $21.00 Million | $446.60 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $31.80 Million | $398.90 Million | ▼ -96.5% |
| 1996 | 2.25x | $25.90 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +1860.7% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $5.10 Million | $44.40 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 1994 | 0.44x | $8.30 Million | $19.00 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 1993 | 0.29x | $5.70 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 1992 | 1.13x | $3.60 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +245.5% |
| 1991 | 0.33x | $1.40 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -41.1% |
| 1990 | 0.55x | $5.20 Million | $9.40 Million | — |