CONMED Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CONMED Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. CONMED Corporation (CNMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.30 Billion) in one year. Check CONMED Corporation earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CONMED Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CONMED Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for CONMED Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check CONMED Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CONMED Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
CONMED Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CONMED Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of CONMED Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $170.69 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $166.97 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $125.35 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +297.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $33.37 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $111.77 Million | $980.58 Million | ▲ +84.2% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $64.53 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $95.13 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $74.70 Million | $706.87 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $65.57 Million | $726.53 Million | ▲ +76.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $38.22 Million | $748.41 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $48.07 Million | $527.87 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $65.18 Million | $516.90 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $80.95 Million | $484.19 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $95.20 Million | $477.46 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $102.99 Million | $362.52 Million | ▲ +196.6% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $38.24 Million | $399.21 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $25.03 Million | $380.99 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $61.15 Million | $399.93 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $65.89 Million | $388.95 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $64.57 Million | $421.22 Million | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $42.43 Million | $450.78 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $74.84 Million | $424.84 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $58.01 Million | $371.57 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $44.92 Million | $355.20 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $77.15 Million | $417.97 Million | ▲ +130.5% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $35.95 Million | $448.97 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $37.00 Million | $450.90 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $21.00 Million | $446.60 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $31.80 Million | $398.90 Million | ▼ -96.5% |
| 1996 | 2.25x | $25.90 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +1860.7% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $5.10 Million | $44.40 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 1994 | 0.44x | $8.30 Million | $19.00 Million | ▲ +51.7% |
| 1993 | 0.29x | $5.70 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -74.4% |
| 1992 | 1.13x | $3.60 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +245.5% |
| 1991 | 0.33x | $1.40 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -41.1% |
| 1990 | 0.55x | $5.20 Million | $9.40 Million | — |