CTS Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CTS Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. CTS Corporation (CTS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($242.72 Million) in one year. Check CTS Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CTS Corporation (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CTS Corporation from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for CTS Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check CTS Corporation (CTS) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CTS Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
CTS Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CTS Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CTS cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.42x | $99.29 Million | $235.26 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $88.81 Million | $214.34 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $121.20 Million | $242.26 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | $86.14 Million | $200.88 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $76.78 Million | $202.37 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $64.41 Million | $238.13 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2018 | 0.34x | $58.15 Million | $170.41 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2017 | 0.30x | $58.05 Million | $193.88 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $47.20 Million | $199.81 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $38.62 Million | $202.48 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $32.42 Million | $167.14 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $37.57 Million | $183.37 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $41.65 Million | $293.31 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $22.19 Million | $217.52 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $19.32 Million | $208.33 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $46.60 Million | $160.20 Million | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $34.10 Million | $211.28 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $48.60 Million | $219.44 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $47.19 Million | $208.81 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $44.52 Million | $204.37 Million | ▲ +229.8% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $13.97 Million | $211.47 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $25.10 Million | $188.06 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $22.45 Million | $225.01 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $65.85 Million | $325.06 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $110.86 Million | $426.57 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $55.70 Million | $357.90 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | $52.40 Million | $169.40 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $58.90 Million | $182.10 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $35.10 Million | $83.20 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 1995 | 0.33x | $26.90 Million | $80.80 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 1994 | 0.17x | $12.60 Million | $74.90 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $17.60 Million | $65.90 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1992 | 0.25x | $12.80 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $16.10 Million | $53.90 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 1990 | 0.42x | $20.90 Million | $50.20 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 1989 | 0.31x | $15.90 Million | $51.70 Million | — |