CTS Corporation (CTS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CTS Corporation (CTS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($242.72 Million) in one year. See financial agility of CTS Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CTS Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CTS Corporation across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CTS Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CTS Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CTS Corporation. Check CTS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.42x | $99.29 Million | $235.26 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $88.81 Million | $214.34 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $121.20 Million | $242.26 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2021 | 0.43x | $86.14 Million | $200.88 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $76.78 Million | $202.37 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $64.41 Million | $238.13 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2018 | 0.34x | $58.15 Million | $170.41 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2017 | 0.30x | $58.05 Million | $193.88 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | $47.20 Million | $199.81 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $38.62 Million | $202.48 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $32.42 Million | $167.14 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $37.57 Million | $183.37 Million | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $41.65 Million | $293.31 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $22.19 Million | $217.52 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $19.32 Million | $208.33 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $46.60 Million | $160.20 Million | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $34.10 Million | $211.28 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $48.60 Million | $219.44 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $47.19 Million | $208.81 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $44.52 Million | $204.37 Million | ▲ +229.8% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $13.97 Million | $211.47 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $25.10 Million | $188.06 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $22.45 Million | $225.01 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $65.85 Million | $325.06 Million | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $110.86 Million | $426.57 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $55.70 Million | $357.90 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | $52.40 Million | $169.40 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $58.90 Million | $182.10 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $35.10 Million | $83.20 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 1995 | 0.33x | $26.90 Million | $80.80 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 1994 | 0.17x | $12.60 Million | $74.90 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $17.60 Million | $65.90 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1992 | 0.25x | $12.80 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $16.10 Million | $53.90 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 1990 | 0.42x | $20.90 Million | $50.20 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 1989 | 0.31x | $15.90 Million | $51.70 Million | — |