Dolby Laboratories Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dolby Laboratories cash flow-to-debt ratio. Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.59x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $349.37 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($591.27 Million) in one year. Check DLB cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Dolby Laboratories (2003–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Dolby Laboratories from 2003 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Dolby Laboratories across 22 annual periods. Check DLB total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Dolby Laboratories Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2024)
Dolby Laboratories cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dolby Laboratories. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Dolby Laboratories generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.53x | $327.25 Million | $623.03 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2023 | 0.46x | $282.07 Million | $607.58 Million | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2022 | 0.73x | $318.58 Million | $438.53 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2021 | 0.89x | $447.75 Million | $501.45 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2020 | 0.72x | $343.85 Million | $478.92 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2019 | 0.64x | $327.67 Million | $508.72 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2018 | 0.76x | $352.20 Million | $463.15 Million | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2017 | 0.95x | $371.05 Million | $389.71 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2016 | 1.08x | $356.84 Million | $331.37 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2015 | 0.97x | $309.39 Million | $319.34 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2014 | 1.47x | $371.14 Million | $252.36 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2013 | 1.15x | $274.66 Million | $237.92 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2012 | 1.79x | $389.80 Million | $217.56 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2011 | 2.03x | $403.69 Million | $199.04 Million | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2010 | 1.51x | $327.30 Million | $217.09 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2009 | 1.25x | $273.23 Million | $218.21 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2008 | 1.00x | $264.47 Million | $264.80 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2007 | 0.95x | $162.97 Million | $172.26 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2006 | 1.06x | $132.50 Million | $125.09 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2005 | 0.75x | $80.42 Million | $106.87 Million | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2004 | 0.46x | $46.86 Million | $101.34 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | $39.64 Million | $92.80 Million | — |