Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $18.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.87 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Everforth, Inc. generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Everforth, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Everforth, Inc. across 35 annual periods. Also explore Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Everforth, Inc. (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Everforth, Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Everforth, Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $327.90 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $400.00 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $456.90 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $307.80 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $193.70 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $424.80 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $313.20 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $287.45 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $196.45 Million | $818.74 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $196.25 Million | $883.73 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $117.49 Million | $982.51 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $96.02 Million | $639.77 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $110.52 Million | $621.06 Million | ▲ +147.2% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $40.70 Million | $565.30 Million | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $23.42 Million | $163.92 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $26.86 Million | $121.63 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $42.01 Million | $116.80 Million | ▲ +86.5% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $35.36 Million | $183.34 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $33.66 Million | $191.65 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2006 | 0.69x | $14.49 Million | $21.05 Million | ▲ +260.1% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $3.26 Million | $17.07 Million | ▲ +154.0% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | $-6.34 Million | $17.91 Million | ▼ -191.1% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $6.25 Million | $16.10 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2002 | 1.19x | $20.40 Million | $17.10 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2001 | 2.43x | $25.48 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2000 | 2.09x | $21.41 Million | $10.27 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 1999 | 1.22x | $10.11 Million | $8.29 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1998 | 1.49x | $11.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 1997 | 1.48x | $8.30 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 1996 | 1.33x | $5.70 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 1995 | 1.23x | $3.20 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 1994 | 1.13x | $2.60 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 1993 | 1.67x | $2.00 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 1992 | 1.10x | $1.10 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 1991 | 0.85x | $1.10 Million | $1.30 Million | — |