Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-137.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.14 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Eastman Chemical Company to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eastman Chemical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Chemical Company across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eastman Chemical Company cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eastman Chemical Company (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Chemical Company. Check cash flow quality index of Eastman Chemical Company to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $970.00 Million | $8.82 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.29 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.37 Billion | $9.10 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $975.00 Million | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $1.62 Billion | $9.73 Billion | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.97 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $1.50 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $1.54 Billion | $10.12 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $1.66 Billion | $10.52 Billion | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.39 Billion | $10.85 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.62 Billion | $11.59 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.43 Billion | $12.48 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $1.30 Billion | $7.97 Billion | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $1.13 Billion | $8.59 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $625.00 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $575.00 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $758.00 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $653.00 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $732.00 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $609.00 Million | $4.14 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $769.00 Million | $4.16 Billion | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $494.00 Million | $4.69 Billion | ▲ +124.0% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $244.00 Million | $5.19 Billion | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $801.00 Million | $5.00 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $397.00 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $846.00 Million | $4.74 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $744.00 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $731.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $698.00 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $746.00 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $838.00 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $816.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $752.00 Million | $3.28 Billion | — |