Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-137.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.14 Billion) in one year. See Eastman Chemical Company free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eastman Chemical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Chemical Company across 33 annual periods. Also explore EMN net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eastman Chemical Company (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Chemical Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EMN market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $970.00 Million | $8.82 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.29 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.37 Billion | $9.10 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $975.00 Million | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $1.62 Billion | $9.73 Billion | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.97 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $1.50 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $1.54 Billion | $10.12 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $1.66 Billion | $10.52 Billion | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.39 Billion | $10.85 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.62 Billion | $11.59 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.43 Billion | $12.48 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $1.30 Billion | $7.97 Billion | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $1.13 Billion | $8.59 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $625.00 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $575.00 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $758.00 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $653.00 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $732.00 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $609.00 Million | $4.14 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $769.00 Million | $4.16 Billion | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $494.00 Million | $4.69 Billion | ▲ +124.0% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $244.00 Million | $5.19 Billion | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $801.00 Million | $5.00 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $397.00 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $846.00 Million | $4.74 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $744.00 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $731.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $698.00 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $746.00 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $838.00 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $816.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $752.00 Million | $3.28 Billion | — |