Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-137.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.14 Billion) in one year. Explore Eastman Chemical Company strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eastman Chemical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Chemical Company across 33 annual periods. Also explore EMN asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eastman Chemical Company (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Chemical Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EMN market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $970.00 Million | $8.82 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.29 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.37 Billion | $9.10 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $975.00 Million | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $1.62 Billion | $9.73 Billion | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.97 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $1.50 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $1.54 Billion | $10.12 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $1.66 Billion | $10.52 Billion | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.39 Billion | $10.85 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.62 Billion | $11.59 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.43 Billion | $12.48 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $1.30 Billion | $7.97 Billion | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $1.13 Billion | $8.59 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $625.00 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $575.00 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $758.00 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $653.00 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $732.00 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $609.00 Million | $4.14 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $769.00 Million | $4.16 Billion | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $494.00 Million | $4.69 Billion | ▲ +124.0% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $244.00 Million | $5.19 Billion | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $801.00 Million | $5.00 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $397.00 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $846.00 Million | $4.74 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $744.00 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $731.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $698.00 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $746.00 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $838.00 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $816.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $752.00 Million | $3.28 Billion | — |