Eastman Chemical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Chemical Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-137.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.14 Billion) in one year. Check EMN cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Eastman Chemical Company (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Eastman Chemical Company from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Chemical Company across 33 annual periods. Check Eastman Chemical Company total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Eastman Chemical Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Eastman Chemical Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Chemical Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Eastman Chemical Company generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $970.00 Million | $8.82 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.29 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.37 Billion | $9.10 Billion | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $975.00 Million | $9.43 Billion | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $1.62 Billion | $9.73 Billion | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.97 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $1.50 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $1.54 Billion | $10.12 Billion | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $1.66 Billion | $10.52 Billion | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.39 Billion | $10.85 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.62 Billion | $11.59 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.43 Billion | $12.48 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $1.30 Billion | $7.97 Billion | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $1.13 Billion | $8.59 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $625.00 Million | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $575.00 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $758.00 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $653.00 Million | $3.73 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $732.00 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | $609.00 Million | $4.14 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $769.00 Million | $4.16 Billion | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $494.00 Million | $4.69 Billion | ▲ +124.0% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $244.00 Million | $5.19 Billion | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $801.00 Million | $5.00 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $397.00 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $846.00 Million | $4.74 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $744.00 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $731.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $698.00 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $746.00 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $838.00 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.26x | $816.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $752.00 Million | $3.28 Billion | — |