Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of April 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.12 Million) in one year. See Enzo Biochem Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enzo Biochem Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enzo Biochem Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Enzo Biochem Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enzo Biochem Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enzo Biochem Inc. Check how high is Enzo Biochem Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.89x | $-26.26 Million | $29.65 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2023 | -0.85x | $-36.98 Million | $43.42 Million | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2022 | -0.40x | $-16.59 Million | $41.40 Million | ▼ -4771.0% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $387.00K | $45.10 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-17.18 Million | $54.16 Million | ▼ -236.0% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.81 Million | $20.61 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2018 | -0.13x | $-2.73 Million | $20.54 Million | ▼ -1120.7% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-205.00K | $18.79 Million | ▼ -100.5% |
| 2016 | 2.39x | $53.13 Million | $22.27 Million | ▲ +1762.9% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | $-3.70 Million | $25.79 Million | ▼ -132.2% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.70 Million | $27.46 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | $-10.02 Million | $24.83 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2012 | -0.30x | $-5.97 Million | $20.02 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2011 | -0.40x | $-8.33 Million | $20.76 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2010 | -0.74x | $-13.46 Million | $18.23 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2009 | -0.70x | $-11.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2008 | -0.53x | $-8.56 Million | $16.23 Million | ▼ -139.7% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-3.77 Million | $17.11 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2006 | -1.71x | $-10.12 Million | $5.94 Million | ▼ -209.0% |
| 2005 | 1.56x | $12.83 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +272.9% |
| 2004 | -0.90x | $-5.58 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -148.5% |
| 2003 | 1.87x | $12.12 Million | $6.50 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2002 | 2.10x | $9.56 Million | $4.56 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2001 | 1.48x | $8.00 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2000 | 0.97x | $4.93 Million | $5.11 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 1999 | 3.36x | $11.10 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1998 | 2.44x | $8.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1997 | 2.26x | $7.70 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +178.4% |
| 1996 | 0.81x | $6.10 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | $9.10 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +444.2% |
| 1994 | -0.23x | $-3.20 Million | $13.80 Million | ▼ -543.5% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $800.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $2.10 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +362.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-2.30 Million | $48.20 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1990 | -0.09x | $-5.10 Million | $53.80 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-4.70 Million | $59.50 Million | — |