Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of April 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.12 Million) in one year. See Enzo Biochem Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enzo Biochem Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enzo Biochem Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore ENZ net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enzo Biochem Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enzo Biochem Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.89x | $-26.26 Million | $29.65 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2023 | -0.85x | $-36.98 Million | $43.42 Million | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2022 | -0.40x | $-16.59 Million | $41.40 Million | ▼ -4771.0% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $387.00K | $45.10 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-17.18 Million | $54.16 Million | ▼ -236.0% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.81 Million | $20.61 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2018 | -0.13x | $-2.73 Million | $20.54 Million | ▼ -1120.7% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-205.00K | $18.79 Million | ▼ -100.5% |
| 2016 | 2.39x | $53.13 Million | $22.27 Million | ▲ +1762.9% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | $-3.70 Million | $25.79 Million | ▼ -132.2% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.70 Million | $27.46 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | $-10.02 Million | $24.83 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2012 | -0.30x | $-5.97 Million | $20.02 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2011 | -0.40x | $-8.33 Million | $20.76 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2010 | -0.74x | $-13.46 Million | $18.23 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2009 | -0.70x | $-11.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2008 | -0.53x | $-8.56 Million | $16.23 Million | ▼ -139.7% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-3.77 Million | $17.11 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2006 | -1.71x | $-10.12 Million | $5.94 Million | ▼ -209.0% |
| 2005 | 1.56x | $12.83 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +272.9% |
| 2004 | -0.90x | $-5.58 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -148.5% |
| 2003 | 1.87x | $12.12 Million | $6.50 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2002 | 2.10x | $9.56 Million | $4.56 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2001 | 1.48x | $8.00 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2000 | 0.97x | $4.93 Million | $5.11 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 1999 | 3.36x | $11.10 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1998 | 2.44x | $8.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1997 | 2.26x | $7.70 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +178.4% |
| 1996 | 0.81x | $6.10 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | $9.10 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +444.2% |
| 1994 | -0.23x | $-3.20 Million | $13.80 Million | ▼ -543.5% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $800.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $2.10 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +362.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-2.30 Million | $48.20 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1990 | -0.09x | $-5.10 Million | $53.80 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-4.70 Million | $59.50 Million | — |