Enzo Biochem Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enzo Biochem Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of April 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.12 Million) in one year. Check ENZ cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Enzo Biochem Inc (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Enzo Biochem Inc from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Enzo Biochem Inc across 36 annual periods. Check ENZ capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Enzo Biochem Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Enzo Biochem Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enzo Biochem Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Enzo Biochem Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.89x | $-26.26 Million | $29.65 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2023 | -0.85x | $-36.98 Million | $43.42 Million | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2022 | -0.40x | $-16.59 Million | $41.40 Million | ▼ -4771.0% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $387.00K | $45.10 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-17.18 Million | $54.16 Million | ▼ -236.0% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.81 Million | $20.61 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2018 | -0.13x | $-2.73 Million | $20.54 Million | ▼ -1120.7% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-205.00K | $18.79 Million | ▼ -100.5% |
| 2016 | 2.39x | $53.13 Million | $22.27 Million | ▲ +1762.9% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | $-3.70 Million | $25.79 Million | ▼ -132.2% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.70 Million | $27.46 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | $-10.02 Million | $24.83 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2012 | -0.30x | $-5.97 Million | $20.02 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2011 | -0.40x | $-8.33 Million | $20.76 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2010 | -0.74x | $-13.46 Million | $18.23 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2009 | -0.70x | $-11.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2008 | -0.53x | $-8.56 Million | $16.23 Million | ▼ -139.7% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-3.77 Million | $17.11 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2006 | -1.71x | $-10.12 Million | $5.94 Million | ▼ -209.0% |
| 2005 | 1.56x | $12.83 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +272.9% |
| 2004 | -0.90x | $-5.58 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -148.5% |
| 2003 | 1.87x | $12.12 Million | $6.50 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2002 | 2.10x | $9.56 Million | $4.56 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2001 | 1.48x | $8.00 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2000 | 0.97x | $4.93 Million | $5.11 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 1999 | 3.36x | $11.10 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1998 | 2.44x | $8.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1997 | 2.26x | $7.70 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +178.4% |
| 1996 | 0.81x | $6.10 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | $9.10 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +444.2% |
| 1994 | -0.23x | $-3.20 Million | $13.80 Million | ▼ -543.5% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $800.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $2.10 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +362.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-2.30 Million | $48.20 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1990 | -0.09x | $-5.10 Million | $53.80 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-4.70 Million | $59.50 Million | — |