Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enzo Biochem Inc (ENZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of April 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.12 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Enzo Biochem Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enzo Biochem Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enzo Biochem Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore ENZ total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enzo Biochem Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enzo Biochem Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ENZ market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.89x | $-26.26 Million | $29.65 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2023 | -0.85x | $-36.98 Million | $43.42 Million | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2022 | -0.40x | $-16.59 Million | $41.40 Million | ▼ -4771.0% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $387.00K | $45.10 Million | ▲ +102.7% |
| 2020 | -0.32x | $-17.18 Million | $54.16 Million | ▼ -236.0% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.81 Million | $20.61 Million | ▲ +275.1% |
| 2018 | -0.13x | $-2.73 Million | $20.54 Million | ▼ -1120.7% |
| 2017 | -0.01x | $-205.00K | $18.79 Million | ▼ -100.5% |
| 2016 | 2.39x | $53.13 Million | $22.27 Million | ▲ +1762.9% |
| 2015 | -0.14x | $-3.70 Million | $25.79 Million | ▼ -132.2% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.70 Million | $27.46 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | $-10.02 Million | $24.83 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2012 | -0.30x | $-5.97 Million | $20.02 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2011 | -0.40x | $-8.33 Million | $20.76 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2010 | -0.74x | $-13.46 Million | $18.23 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2009 | -0.70x | $-11.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2008 | -0.53x | $-8.56 Million | $16.23 Million | ▼ -139.7% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-3.77 Million | $17.11 Million | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2006 | -1.71x | $-10.12 Million | $5.94 Million | ▼ -209.0% |
| 2005 | 1.56x | $12.83 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +272.9% |
| 2004 | -0.90x | $-5.58 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -148.5% |
| 2003 | 1.87x | $12.12 Million | $6.50 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2002 | 2.10x | $9.56 Million | $4.56 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2001 | 1.48x | $8.00 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +53.0% |
| 2000 | 0.97x | $4.93 Million | $5.11 Million | ▼ -71.3% |
| 1999 | 3.36x | $11.10 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 1998 | 2.44x | $8.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1997 | 2.26x | $7.70 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +178.4% |
| 1996 | 0.81x | $6.10 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1995 | 0.80x | $9.10 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +444.2% |
| 1994 | -0.23x | $-3.20 Million | $13.80 Million | ▼ -543.5% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $800.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $2.10 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +362.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-2.30 Million | $48.20 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1990 | -0.09x | $-5.10 Million | $53.80 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1989 | -0.08x | $-4.70 Million | $59.50 Million | — |