Equity Residential (EQR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Equity Residential (EQR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $400.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.50 Billion) in one year. See Equity Residential (EQR) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Equity Residential Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Equity Residential across 33 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Equity Residential to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Equity Residential (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Equity Residential. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Equity Residential worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $1.65 Billion | $9.34 Billion | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $1.57 Billion | $9.25 Billion | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $1.53 Billion | $8.46 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2022 | 0.17x | $1.45 Billion | $8.52 Billion | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $1.26 Billion | $9.48 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $1.27 Billion | $9.18 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $1.46 Billion | $10.16 Billion | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.36 Billion | $9.62 Billion | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $1.27 Billion | $9.73 Billion | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $1.21 Billion | $9.80 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $1.36 Billion | $11.89 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.32 Billion | $11.74 Billion | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $868.92 Million | $11.63 Billion | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.05 Billion | $9.28 Billion | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $800.47 Million | $10.38 Billion | ▲ +12.5% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $726.04 Million | $10.59 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $670.81 Million | $10.24 Billion | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $755.25 Million | $10.75 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $793.13 Million | $10.27 Billion | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $755.47 Million | $8.77 Billion | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | $698.53 Million | $8.28 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $707.06 Million | $7.04 Billion | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $744.32 Million | $5.85 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | $888.26 Million | $6.00 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $889.67 Million | $6.19 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $836.42 Million | $6.03 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $788.97 Million | $5.75 Billion | ▲ +24.9% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $542.15 Million | $4.94 Billion | ▲ +3.8% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $331.10 Million | $3.13 Billion | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $210.93 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +31.8% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $126.50 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +31.2% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $94.00 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | $25.60 Million | $306.20 Million | — |