Franklin Universal Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Franklin Universal Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio. Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($60.77 Million) in one year. Check Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Franklin Universal Closed Fund (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Franklin Universal Closed Fund from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Franklin Universal Closed Fund across 25 annual periods. Check Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Franklin Universal Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Franklin Universal Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Franklin Universal Closed Fund. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Franklin Universal Closed Fund operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $10.38 Million | $60.88 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $17.84 Million | $60.73 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $11.50 Million | $66.62 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $16.34 Million | $66.77 Million | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $10.83 Million | $67.98 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $10.24 Million | $67.46 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $10.13 Million | $67.16 Million | ▲ +114.2% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $4.65 Million | $66.09 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $9.65 Million | $61.05 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $11.91 Million | $60.97 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $11.91 Million | $61.28 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $11.92 Million | $61.28 Million | ▲ +305.8% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-6.50 Million | $68.75 Million | ▼ -136.0% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $11.46 Million | $43.70 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $9.66 Million | $43.60 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $13.26 Million | $43.30 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2009 | 0.84x | $36.26 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +970.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $5.20 Million | $66.30 Million | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $23.85 Million | $56.40 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $16.35 Million | $56.80 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $11.63 Million | $56.50 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $10.62 Million | $56.00 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $11.13 Million | $57.10 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $14.97 Million | $60.20 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $12.81 Million | $75.20 Million | — |