Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($60.77 Million) in one year. See Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Franklin Universal Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Franklin Universal Closed Fund across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FT cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Franklin Universal Closed Fund (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Franklin Universal Closed Fund. Check FT cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $10.38 Million | $60.88 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $17.84 Million | $60.73 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $11.50 Million | $66.62 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $16.34 Million | $66.77 Million | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $10.83 Million | $67.98 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $10.24 Million | $67.46 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $10.13 Million | $67.16 Million | ▲ +114.2% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $4.65 Million | $66.09 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $9.65 Million | $61.05 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $11.91 Million | $60.97 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $11.91 Million | $61.28 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $11.92 Million | $61.28 Million | ▲ +305.8% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-6.50 Million | $68.75 Million | ▼ -136.0% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $11.46 Million | $43.70 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $9.66 Million | $43.60 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $13.26 Million | $43.30 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2009 | 0.84x | $36.26 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +970.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $5.20 Million | $66.30 Million | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $23.85 Million | $56.40 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $16.35 Million | $56.80 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $11.63 Million | $56.50 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $10.62 Million | $56.00 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $11.13 Million | $57.10 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $14.97 Million | $60.20 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $12.81 Million | $75.20 Million | — |