Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Franklin Universal Closed Fund (FT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.15 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($60.77 Million) in one year. See Franklin Universal Closed Fund free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Franklin Universal Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Franklin Universal Closed Fund across 25 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Franklin Universal Closed Fund to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Franklin Universal Closed Fund (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Franklin Universal Closed Fund. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Franklin Universal Closed Fund.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $10.38 Million | $60.88 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $17.84 Million | $60.73 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $11.50 Million | $66.62 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $16.34 Million | $66.77 Million | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $10.83 Million | $67.98 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $10.24 Million | $67.46 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $10.13 Million | $67.16 Million | ▲ +114.2% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $4.65 Million | $66.09 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $9.65 Million | $61.05 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $11.91 Million | $60.97 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $11.91 Million | $61.28 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $11.92 Million | $61.28 Million | ▲ +305.8% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-6.50 Million | $68.75 Million | ▼ -136.0% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $11.46 Million | $43.70 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | $9.66 Million | $43.60 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $13.26 Million | $43.30 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2009 | 0.84x | $36.26 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +970.2% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $5.20 Million | $66.30 Million | ▼ -81.5% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $23.85 Million | $56.40 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $16.35 Million | $56.80 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $11.63 Million | $56.50 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | $10.62 Million | $56.00 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $11.13 Million | $57.10 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $14.97 Million | $60.20 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $12.81 Million | $75.20 Million | — |