Flotek Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Flotek Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Flotek Industries Inc (FTK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.58 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($138.82 Million) in one year. Check Flotek Industries Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Flotek Industries Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Flotek Industries Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Flotek Industries Inc across 29 annual periods. Check FTK capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Flotek Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Flotek Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Flotek Industries Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Flotek Industries Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $7.20 Million | $106.99 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $3.36 Million | $56.90 Million | ▲ +129.0% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | $-11.30 Million | $55.55 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2022 | -0.28x | $-44.63 Million | $162.21 Million | ▲ +68.0% |
| 2021 | -0.86x | $-25.84 Million | $30.05 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2020 | -1.23x | $-47.84 Million | $39.04 Million | ▼ -275.9% |
| 2019 | -0.33x | $-19.09 Million | $58.57 Million | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2018 | -0.23x | $-19.52 Million | $84.26 Million | ▼ -191.0% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $16.45 Million | $64.63 Million | ▲ +1118.0% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $2.07 Million | $98.89 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $26.67 Million | $109.08 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2014 | 0.42x | $48.82 Million | $116.92 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | $39.55 Million | $125.83 Million | ▼ -58.7% |
| 2012 | 0.76x | $49.52 Million | $65.14 Million | ▲ +260.4% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $32.42 Million | $153.71 Million | ▲ +228.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $12.10 Million | $188.26 Million | ▲ +332.1% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $2.19 Million | $146.98 Million | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $24.87 Million | $193.05 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $25.09 Million | $83.33 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2006 | 0.42x | $12.44 Million | $29.38 Million | ▲ +237.4% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $2.13 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $1.40 Million | $11.13 Million | ▲ +3947.7% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $-37.26K | $11.41 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2002 | -0.18x | $-2.13 Million | $11.60 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-1.08 Million | $9.21 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2000 | -0.24x | $-794.08K | $3.35 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.24x | $-794.08K | $3.35 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 1998 | -0.28x | $-690.80K | $2.47 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 1997 | -0.59x | $-1.08 Million | $1.83 Million | — |