Heico Corporation (HEI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Heico Corporation (HEI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $178.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.00 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Heico Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Heico Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Heico Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore HEI shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Heico Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Heico Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Heico Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $934.27 Million | $4.12 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $672.37 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $448.74 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2022 | 0.42x | $467.86 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2021 | 0.47x | $444.08 Million | $948.88 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $409.12 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2019 | 0.40x | $437.38 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2018 | 0.32x | $328.49 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $274.88 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2016 | 0.29x | $249.18 Million | $851.20 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $172.86 Million | $751.83 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $190.69 Million | $674.63 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $131.84 Million | $809.78 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $138.59 Million | $473.09 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2011 | 0.49x | $125.52 Million | $255.49 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2010 | 0.59x | $101.72 Million | $171.77 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | $75.82 Million | $185.31 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2008 | 0.42x | $73.16 Million | $174.80 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $57.45 Million | $186.76 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $46.91 Million | $154.26 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $35.81 Million | $113.09 Million | ▼ -48.1% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $44.05 Million | $72.21 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $27.88 Million | $71.15 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $23.29 Million | $90.95 Million | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $16.53 Million | $100.03 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $12.13 Million | $78.54 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $8.00 Million | $103.90 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $9.50 Million | $50.60 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $1.70 Million | $25.50 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $1.70 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 1995 | 0.41x | $7.10 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 1994 | 0.33x | $3.90 Million | $11.90 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1993 | 0.34x | $2.80 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +787.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $800.00K | $20.80 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 1991 | 0.92x | $8.00 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +408.8% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $1.50 Million | $8.30 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 1989 | 0.52x | $4.90 Million | $9.50 Million | — |