Heico Corporation (HEI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Heico Corporation (HEI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $291.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.20 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does Heico Corporation reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Heico Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Heico Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore how large is Heico Corporation's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Heico Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Heico Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Heico Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $934.27 Million | $4.12 Billion | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $672.37 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $448.74 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▼ -73.2% |
| 2022 | 0.42x | $467.86 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2021 | 0.47x | $444.08 Million | $948.88 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $409.12 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2019 | 0.40x | $437.38 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2018 | 0.32x | $328.49 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $274.88 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2016 | 0.29x | $249.18 Million | $851.20 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $172.86 Million | $751.83 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | $190.69 Million | $674.63 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $131.84 Million | $809.78 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $138.59 Million | $473.09 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2011 | 0.49x | $125.52 Million | $255.49 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2010 | 0.59x | $101.72 Million | $171.77 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | $75.82 Million | $185.31 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2008 | 0.42x | $73.16 Million | $174.80 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $57.45 Million | $186.76 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $46.91 Million | $154.26 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $35.81 Million | $113.09 Million | ▼ -48.1% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $44.05 Million | $72.21 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $27.88 Million | $71.15 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2002 | 0.26x | $23.29 Million | $90.95 Million | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $16.53 Million | $100.03 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $12.13 Million | $78.54 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $8.00 Million | $103.90 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $9.50 Million | $50.60 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $1.70 Million | $25.50 Million | ▼ -20.4% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $1.70 Million | $20.30 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 1995 | 0.41x | $7.10 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 1994 | 0.33x | $3.90 Million | $11.90 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1993 | 0.34x | $2.80 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +787.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $800.00K | $20.80 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 1991 | 0.92x | $8.00 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +408.8% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $1.50 Million | $8.30 Million | ▼ -65.0% |
| 1989 | 0.52x | $4.90 Million | $9.50 Million | — |