Hecla Mining Company (HL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.24x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $194.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($805.48 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Hecla Mining Company to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hecla Mining Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hecla Mining Company across 37 annual periods. Also explore Hecla Mining Company asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hecla Mining Company (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hecla Mining Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hecla Mining Company (HL) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.58x | $562.64 Million | $969.00 Million | ▲ +150.5% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | $218.28 Million | $941.55 Million | ▲ +220.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $75.50 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $89.89 Million | $948.21 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $220.34 Million | $968.02 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $180.79 Million | $986.42 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $120.87 Million | $944.88 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $94.22 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $115.88 Million | $881.08 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $225.33 Million | $891.83 Million | ▲ +109.6% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $106.44 Million | $883.00 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $83.12 Million | $865.09 Million | ▲ +226.6% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $26.64 Million | $905.70 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $69.02 Million | $240.34 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $69.89 Million | $255.98 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $197.81 Million | $420.24 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2009 | 0.63x | $114.97 Million | $181.30 Million | ▲ +1355.5% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $14.79 Million | $339.33 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | $65.00 Million | $158.21 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | $61.49 Million | $121.54 Million | ▲ +1048.4% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-5.91 Million | $110.84 Million | ▼ -144.1% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $13.33 Million | $110.12 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $25.98 Million | $106.77 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $20.23 Million | $88.21 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $8.04 Million | $95.15 Million | ▲ +321.1% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-5.73 Million | $150.09 Million | ▼ -275.3% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $2.96 Million | $135.66 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $2.00 Million | $100.40 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $6.00 Million | $90.40 Million | ▼ -63.4% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | $22.30 Million | $122.90 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $11.80 Million | $94.10 Million | ▲ +235.1% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-5.30 Million | $57.10 Million | ▼ -200.2% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $8.60 Million | $92.80 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $9.50 Million | $107.90 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 1991 | 0.04x | $4.80 Million | $107.10 Million | ▼ -83.6% |
| 1990 | 0.27x | $26.60 Million | $97.10 Million | ▲ +249.0% |
| 1989 | 0.08x | $7.30 Million | $93.00 Million | — |