Hecla Mining Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hecla Mining Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.34x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $174.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($507.45 Million) in one year. Check Hecla Mining Company (HL) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hecla Mining Company (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hecla Mining Company from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hecla Mining Company across 37 annual periods. Check HL cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Hecla Mining Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Hecla Mining Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hecla Mining Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hecla Mining Company cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.58x | $562.64 Million | $969.00 Million | ▲ +150.5% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | $218.28 Million | $941.55 Million | ▲ +220.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $75.50 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $89.89 Million | $948.21 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $220.34 Million | $968.02 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $180.79 Million | $986.42 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $120.87 Million | $944.88 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $94.22 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $115.88 Million | $881.08 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $225.33 Million | $891.83 Million | ▲ +109.6% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $106.44 Million | $883.00 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $83.12 Million | $865.09 Million | ▲ +226.6% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $26.64 Million | $905.70 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $69.02 Million | $240.34 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $69.89 Million | $255.98 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $197.81 Million | $420.24 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2009 | 0.63x | $114.97 Million | $181.30 Million | ▲ +1355.5% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $14.79 Million | $339.33 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | $65.00 Million | $158.21 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2006 | 0.51x | $61.49 Million | $121.54 Million | ▲ +1048.4% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-5.91 Million | $110.84 Million | ▼ -144.1% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $13.33 Million | $110.12 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $25.98 Million | $106.77 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $20.23 Million | $88.21 Million | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $8.04 Million | $95.15 Million | ▲ +321.1% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-5.73 Million | $150.09 Million | ▼ -275.3% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $2.96 Million | $135.66 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $2.00 Million | $100.40 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $6.00 Million | $90.40 Million | ▼ -63.4% |
| 1996 | 0.18x | $22.30 Million | $122.90 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $11.80 Million | $94.10 Million | ▲ +235.1% |
| 1994 | -0.09x | $-5.30 Million | $57.10 Million | ▼ -200.2% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $8.60 Million | $92.80 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $9.50 Million | $107.90 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 1991 | 0.04x | $4.80 Million | $107.10 Million | ▼ -83.6% |
| 1990 | 0.27x | $26.60 Million | $97.10 Million | ▲ +249.0% |
| 1989 | 0.08x | $7.30 Million | $93.00 Million | — |