Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc (HLX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc (HLX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $24.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.06 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc (HLX) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.17x | $186.03 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $152.46 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +146.7% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $51.11 Million | $872.63 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $140.12 Million | $678.56 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $98.80 Million | $753.93 Million | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $169.67 Million | $897.14 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $196.74 Million | $729.95 Million | ▲ +315.2% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $51.64 Million | $795.44 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $38.71 Million | $965.13 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $110.81 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -71.5% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $359.49 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +371.0% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $74.36 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $452.50 Million | $1.97 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $567.16 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▲ +85.0% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $331.45 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $415.55 Million | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $437.72 Million | $3.58 Billion | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $416.33 Million | $3.34 Billion | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $514.04 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $242.43 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $226.81 Million | $553.47 Million | ▲ +136.0% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $87.12 Million | $501.70 Million | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $65.20 Million | $529.52 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2001 | 0.36x | $89.11 Million | $246.77 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2000 | 0.35x | $53.70 Million | $152.76 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | $25.50 Million | $92.80 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 1998 | 0.71x | $35.70 Million | $50.60 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1997 | 0.62x | $22.30 Million | $36.20 Million | ▲ +323.9% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $7.60 Million | $52.30 Million | ▼ -72.8% |
| 1995 | 0.53x | $12.00 Million | $22.50 Million | — |