Knight Transportation Inc (KNX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Knight Transportation Inc (KNX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $723.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.86 Billion) in one year. Explore KNX long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Knight Transportation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Knight Transportation Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore KNX asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Knight Transportation Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Knight Transportation Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Knight Transportation Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $1.27 Billion | $4.86 Billion | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $799.06 Million | $5.96 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $1.16 Billion | $6.16 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | $1.44 Billion | $4.18 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $1.19 Billion | $4.27 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | $919.64 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2019 | 0.31x | $839.59 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2018 | 0.36x | $881.98 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +176.2% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $318.57 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -84.5% |
| 2016 | 0.84x | $243.35 Million | $289.79 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2015 | 0.54x | $205.76 Million | $379.86 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | $177.19 Million | $383.58 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2013 | 0.54x | $138.52 Million | $254.68 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2012 | 0.52x | $150.82 Million | $291.67 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2011 | 0.62x | $160.70 Million | $260.83 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2010 | 1.00x | $170.11 Million | $169.52 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2009 | 0.52x | $86.90 Million | $166.31 Million | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | $141.44 Million | $163.04 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2007 | 0.76x | $118.36 Million | $155.81 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2006 | 0.92x | $133.03 Million | $144.12 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2005 | 0.82x | $107.76 Million | $130.90 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2004 | 0.88x | $98.90 Million | $111.85 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2003 | 1.04x | $84.41 Million | $81.30 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2002 | 0.66x | $55.49 Million | $84.18 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2001 | 0.63x | $46.17 Million | $73.42 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $34.55 Million | $101.86 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $18.93 Million | $81.73 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 1998 | 0.43x | $20.01 Million | $46.31 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 1997 | 0.91x | $23.61 Million | $25.89 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1996 | 0.79x | $14.28 Million | $18.16 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 1995 | 0.58x | $10.65 Million | $18.37 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 1994 | 0.74x | $10.10 Million | $13.69 Million | — |