Knight Transportation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Knight Transportation Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Knight Transportation Inc (KNX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $307.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.01 Billion) in one year. Check Knight Transportation Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Knight Transportation Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Knight Transportation Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Knight Transportation Inc across 32 annual periods. Check KNX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Knight Transportation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Knight Transportation Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Knight Transportation Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KNX cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $1.27 Billion | $4.86 Billion | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $799.06 Million | $5.96 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $1.16 Billion | $6.16 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | $1.44 Billion | $4.18 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $1.19 Billion | $4.27 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | $919.64 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2019 | 0.31x | $839.59 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2018 | 0.36x | $881.98 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +176.2% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $318.57 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -84.5% |
| 2016 | 0.84x | $243.35 Million | $289.79 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2015 | 0.54x | $205.76 Million | $379.86 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | $177.19 Million | $383.58 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2013 | 0.54x | $138.52 Million | $254.68 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2012 | 0.52x | $150.82 Million | $291.67 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2011 | 0.62x | $160.70 Million | $260.83 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2010 | 1.00x | $170.11 Million | $169.52 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2009 | 0.52x | $86.90 Million | $166.31 Million | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | $141.44 Million | $163.04 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2007 | 0.76x | $118.36 Million | $155.81 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2006 | 0.92x | $133.03 Million | $144.12 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2005 | 0.82x | $107.76 Million | $130.90 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2004 | 0.88x | $98.90 Million | $111.85 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2003 | 1.04x | $84.41 Million | $81.30 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2002 | 0.66x | $55.49 Million | $84.18 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2001 | 0.63x | $46.17 Million | $73.42 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | $34.55 Million | $101.86 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $18.93 Million | $81.73 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 1998 | 0.43x | $20.01 Million | $46.31 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 1997 | 0.91x | $23.61 Million | $25.89 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1996 | 0.79x | $14.28 Million | $18.16 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 1995 | 0.58x | $10.65 Million | $18.37 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 1994 | 0.74x | $10.10 Million | $13.69 Million | — |