Lithium Argentina AG Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lithium Argentina AG cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($251.73 Million) in one year. Check Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lithium Argentina AG (2007–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lithium Argentina AG from 2007 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lithium Argentina AG across 18 annual periods. Check LAR capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lithium Argentina AG Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2007–2024)
Lithium Argentina AG cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2007 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lithium Argentina AG. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lithium Argentina AG operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.09x | $-21.81 Million | $240.29 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2023 | -0.26x | $-58.97 Million | $226.09 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | $-62.64 Million | $232.55 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2021 | -0.19x | $-53.18 Million | $281.03 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2020 | -0.23x | $-30.88 Million | $136.02 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2019 | -0.13x | $-17.65 Million | $134.18 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2018 | -0.86x | $-18.54 Million | $21.66 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2017 | -2.73x | $-12.91 Million | $4.72 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2016 | -3.49x | $-10.04 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -225.8% |
| 2015 | -1.07x | $-6.71 Million | $6.27 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2014 | -2.12x | $-5.42 Million | $2.56 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2013 | -2.14x | $-4.64 Million | $2.17 Million | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2012 | -34.64x | $-7.52 Million | $217.00K | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2011 | -22.06x | $-9.84 Million | $446.00K | ▼ -347.9% |
| 2010 | -4.93x | $-2.80 Million | $568.91K | ▼ -83.3% |
| 2009 | -2.69x | $-1.92 Million | $715.01K | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2008 | -5.61x | $-718.20K | $128.12K | ▼ -4284.3% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-28.19K | $220.47K | — |