BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($228.40 Million) in one year. Check how high is BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc across 37 annual periods. Check LEO total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LEO operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $12.65 Million | $222.97 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $12.82 Million | $225.34 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $53.17 Million | $231.89 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $45.19 Million | $178.13 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $52.51 Million | $198.83 Million | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $30.63 Million | $223.69 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $31.49 Million | $248.30 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2018 | 0.39x | $90.38 Million | $231.55 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $29.97 Million | $149.99 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $38.76 Million | $145.96 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | $36.47 Million | $147.04 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $63.38 Million | $148.18 Million | ▲ +480.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $10.60 Million | $143.85 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2012 | 1.16x | $91.67 Million | $79.30 Million | ▲ +322.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $22.21 Million | $81.10 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2010 | 0.78x | $46.94 Million | $60.30 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2009 | 100.70x | $70.49 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +7696.7% |
| 2008 | -1.33x | $-34.73 Million | $26.20 Million | ▼ -368.6% |
| 2007 | 0.49x | $19.79 Million | $40.10 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $45.56 Million | $48.70 Million | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2005 | 65.56x | $52.45 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +547.1% |
| 2004 | 10.13x | $45.59 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +162.8% |
| 2003 | 3.86x | $33.54 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2002 | 3.63x | $26.53 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2001 | 42.31x | $59.23 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +495.9% |
| 2000 | 7.10x | $42.60 Million | $6.00 Million | ▲ +125.6% |
| 1999 | -27.70x | $-13.85 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -151.5% |
| 1998 | 53.74x | $48.37 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +2067.8% |
| 1997 | 2.48x | $46.61 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -96.3% |
| 1996 | 66.54x | $33.27 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +226.4% |
| 1995 | 20.39x | $53.01 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +781.0% |
| 1994 | 2.31x | $1.62 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -98.0% |
| 1993 | 113.60x | $56.80 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1992 | 78.45x | $47.07 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1991 | 106.56x | $53.28 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +114.3% |
| 1990 | 49.72x | $29.83 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1989 | 65.71x | $46.00 Million | $700.00K | — |