BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.35 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($222.97 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore LEO net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $12.65 Million | $222.97 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $12.82 Million | $225.34 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $53.17 Million | $231.89 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $45.19 Million | $178.13 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $52.51 Million | $198.83 Million | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $30.63 Million | $223.69 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $31.49 Million | $248.30 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2018 | 0.39x | $90.38 Million | $231.55 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $29.97 Million | $149.99 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $38.76 Million | $145.96 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | $36.47 Million | $147.04 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $63.38 Million | $148.18 Million | ▲ +480.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $10.60 Million | $143.85 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2012 | 1.16x | $91.67 Million | $79.30 Million | ▲ +322.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $22.21 Million | $81.10 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2010 | 0.78x | $46.94 Million | $60.30 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2009 | 100.70x | $70.49 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +7696.7% |
| 2008 | -1.33x | $-34.73 Million | $26.20 Million | ▼ -368.6% |
| 2007 | 0.49x | $19.79 Million | $40.10 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $45.56 Million | $48.70 Million | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2005 | 65.56x | $52.45 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +547.1% |
| 2004 | 10.13x | $45.59 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +162.8% |
| 2003 | 3.86x | $33.54 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2002 | 3.63x | $26.53 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2001 | 42.31x | $59.23 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +495.9% |
| 2000 | 7.10x | $42.60 Million | $6.00 Million | ▲ +125.6% |
| 1999 | -27.70x | $-13.85 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -151.5% |
| 1998 | 53.74x | $48.37 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +2067.8% |
| 1997 | 2.48x | $46.61 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -96.3% |
| 1996 | 66.54x | $33.27 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +226.4% |
| 1995 | 20.39x | $53.01 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +781.0% |
| 1994 | 2.31x | $1.62 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -98.0% |
| 1993 | 113.60x | $56.80 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1992 | 78.45x | $47.07 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1991 | 106.56x | $53.28 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +114.3% |
| 1990 | 49.72x | $29.83 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1989 | 65.71x | $46.00 Million | $700.00K | — |