BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.35 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($222.97 Million) in one year. Explore BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LEO company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $12.65 Million | $222.97 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $12.82 Million | $225.34 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $53.17 Million | $231.89 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $45.19 Million | $178.13 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $52.51 Million | $198.83 Million | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $30.63 Million | $223.69 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $31.49 Million | $248.30 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2018 | 0.39x | $90.38 Million | $231.55 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $29.97 Million | $149.99 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $38.76 Million | $145.96 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | $36.47 Million | $147.04 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $63.38 Million | $148.18 Million | ▲ +480.7% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $10.60 Million | $143.85 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2012 | 1.16x | $91.67 Million | $79.30 Million | ▲ +322.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $22.21 Million | $81.10 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2010 | 0.78x | $46.94 Million | $60.30 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2009 | 100.70x | $70.49 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +7696.7% |
| 2008 | -1.33x | $-34.73 Million | $26.20 Million | ▼ -368.6% |
| 2007 | 0.49x | $19.79 Million | $40.10 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $45.56 Million | $48.70 Million | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2005 | 65.56x | $52.45 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +547.1% |
| 2004 | 10.13x | $45.59 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +162.8% |
| 2003 | 3.86x | $33.54 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2002 | 3.63x | $26.53 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2001 | 42.31x | $59.23 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +495.9% |
| 2000 | 7.10x | $42.60 Million | $6.00 Million | ▲ +125.6% |
| 1999 | -27.70x | $-13.85 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -151.5% |
| 1998 | 53.74x | $48.37 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +2067.8% |
| 1997 | 2.48x | $46.61 Million | $18.80 Million | ▼ -96.3% |
| 1996 | 66.54x | $33.27 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +226.4% |
| 1995 | 20.39x | $53.01 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +781.0% |
| 1994 | 2.31x | $1.62 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -98.0% |
| 1993 | 113.60x | $56.80 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1992 | 78.45x | $47.07 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1991 | 106.56x | $53.28 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +114.3% |
| 1990 | 49.72x | $29.83 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1989 | 65.71x | $46.00 Million | $700.00K | — |