Lindsay Corporation (LNN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lindsay Corporation (LNN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-597.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($310.24 Million) in one year. See Lindsay Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lindsay Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lindsay Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Lindsay Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lindsay Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lindsay Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LNN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.43x | $132.91 Million | $307.99 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $95.76 Million | $279.34 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $119.71 Million | $290.01 Million | ▲ +4196.9% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $3.05 Million | $317.30 Million | ▼ -93.5% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $43.97 Million | $298.74 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $46.03 Million | $272.01 Million | ▲ +934.5% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $3.80 Million | $232.10 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $33.93 Million | $223.39 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $39.45 Million | $235.98 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $33.07 Million | $248.00 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $48.68 Million | $247.91 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2014 | 0.64x | $91.80 Million | $143.90 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2013 | 0.44x | $57.51 Million | $131.66 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0.50x | $52.44 Million | $104.69 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2011 | 0.41x | $43.05 Million | $105.48 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $25.24 Million | $95.87 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2009 | 0.57x | $57.49 Million | $100.24 Million | ▲ +146.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $30.51 Million | $130.98 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $10.12 Million | $101.18 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $14.40 Million | $71.33 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $11.78 Million | $25.51 Million | ▲ +927.5% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $1.21 Million | $26.82 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2003 | 0.57x | $15.31 Million | $26.93 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2002 | 0.53x | $11.56 Million | $22.02 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.53x | $10.04 Million | $18.84 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2000 | 0.44x | $8.06 Million | $18.38 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 1999 | 1.11x | $19.60 Million | $17.70 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1998 | 1.61x | $29.00 Million | $18.00 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 1997 | 1.01x | $21.30 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 1996 | 0.49x | $9.80 Million | $20.00 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 1995 | 0.72x | $12.50 Million | $17.40 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1994 | 0.49x | $10.00 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +329.3% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $2.80 Million | $24.40 Million | ▼ -78.8% |
| 1992 | 0.54x | $14.60 Million | $27.00 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 1991 | 0.57x | $15.60 Million | $27.60 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1990 | 0.40x | $9.10 Million | $22.90 Million | — |