Lindsay Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lindsay Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lindsay Corporation (LNN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($322.55 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Lindsay Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lindsay Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lindsay Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lindsay Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Lindsay Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Lindsay Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Lindsay Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lindsay Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Lindsay Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.43x | $132.91 Million | $307.99 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $95.76 Million | $279.34 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $119.71 Million | $290.01 Million | ▲ +4196.9% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $3.05 Million | $317.30 Million | ▼ -93.5% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $43.97 Million | $298.74 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $46.03 Million | $272.01 Million | ▲ +934.5% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $3.80 Million | $232.10 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $33.93 Million | $223.39 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $39.45 Million | $235.98 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $33.07 Million | $248.00 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | $48.68 Million | $247.91 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2014 | 0.64x | $91.80 Million | $143.90 Million | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2013 | 0.44x | $57.51 Million | $131.66 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0.50x | $52.44 Million | $104.69 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2011 | 0.41x | $43.05 Million | $105.48 Million | ▲ +55.0% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $25.24 Million | $95.87 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 2009 | 0.57x | $57.49 Million | $100.24 Million | ▲ +146.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $30.51 Million | $130.98 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $10.12 Million | $101.18 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $14.40 Million | $71.33 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $11.78 Million | $25.51 Million | ▲ +927.5% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $1.21 Million | $26.82 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2003 | 0.57x | $15.31 Million | $26.93 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2002 | 0.53x | $11.56 Million | $22.02 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.53x | $10.04 Million | $18.84 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2000 | 0.44x | $8.06 Million | $18.38 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 1999 | 1.11x | $19.60 Million | $17.70 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1998 | 1.61x | $29.00 Million | $18.00 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 1997 | 1.01x | $21.30 Million | $21.00 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 1996 | 0.49x | $9.80 Million | $20.00 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 1995 | 0.72x | $12.50 Million | $17.40 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1994 | 0.49x | $10.00 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +329.3% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $2.80 Million | $24.40 Million | ▼ -78.8% |
| 1992 | 0.54x | $14.60 Million | $27.00 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 1991 | 0.57x | $15.60 Million | $27.60 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 1990 | 0.40x | $9.10 Million | $22.90 Million | — |