Marcus Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Marcus Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Marcus Corporation (MCS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($550.89 Million) in one year. Check MCS cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Marcus Corporation (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Marcus Corporation from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Marcus Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check Marcus Corporation (MCS) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Marcus Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Marcus Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Marcus Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Marcus Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $84.20 Million | $557.15 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $103.94 Million | $579.66 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $102.63 Million | $593.93 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $93.21 Million | $607.68 Million | ▲ +143.7% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $46.25 Million | $734.75 Million | ▲ +169.4% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | $-68.55 Million | $755.46 Million | ▼ -147.3% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $141.48 Million | $737.73 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $137.39 Million | $499.21 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $109.04 Million | $572.67 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $82.66 Million | $516.94 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $67.31 Million | $439.00 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $66.44 Million | $438.94 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $63.20 Million | $430.00 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $69.03 Million | $389.22 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $61.50 Million | $354.97 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $52.74 Million | $369.04 Million | ▼ -21.3% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | $69.44 Million | $382.33 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $57.77 Million | $404.15 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $64.86 Million | $378.87 Million | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $39.57 Million | $285.91 Million | ▲ +413.0% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-12.99 Million | $293.84 Million | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $91.86 Million | $351.15 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $71.57 Million | $385.46 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $73.07 Million | $420.72 Million | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $52.83 Million | $420.96 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $67.33 Million | $398.53 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $60.00 Million | $362.50 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $71.70 Million | $306.00 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $61.10 Million | $244.70 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $41.80 Million | $204.10 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | $56.90 Million | $176.70 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1994 | 0.30x | $50.10 Million | $167.70 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 1993 | 0.30x | $51.00 Million | $167.70 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 1992 | 0.27x | $36.80 Million | $135.50 Million | ▲ +23.0% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $33.00 Million | $149.50 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 1990 | 0.23x | $32.00 Million | $140.40 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1989 | 0.21x | $25.50 Million | $123.80 Million | — |