Mednax Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mednax Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mednax Inc (MD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $125.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.25 Billion) in one year. Check MD cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mednax Inc (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mednax Inc from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mednax Inc across 32 annual periods. Check MD capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mednax Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Mednax Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mednax Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mednax Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $271.09 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $206.57 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $137.32 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $166.94 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +172.8% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $76.74 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $204.62 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $346.64 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $289.93 Million | $2.85 Billion | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $511.38 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $443.78 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $368.70 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $422.64 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2013 | 0.57x | $405.40 Million | $706.44 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2012 | 0.46x | $325.69 Million | $714.97 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2011 | 0.50x | $271.02 Million | $541.63 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $240.56 Million | $590.19 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $241.37 Million | $499.25 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $181.39 Million | $531.74 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2007 | 0.55x | $188.52 Million | $343.75 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2006 | 0.66x | $177.27 Million | $269.37 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2005 | 0.78x | $162.42 Million | $208.61 Million | ▲ +37.1% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $123.75 Million | $217.86 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2003 | 0.81x | $118.03 Million | $145.22 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2002 | 0.97x | $97.84 Million | $100.68 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.96x | $90.34 Million | $94.25 Million | ▲ +119.6% |
| 2000 | 0.44x | $36.15 Million | $82.83 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $24.00 Million | $105.90 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 1998 | 0.53x | $33.80 Million | $63.30 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 1997 | 0.88x | $29.00 Million | $33.10 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 1996 | 0.65x | $14.80 Million | $22.70 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 1995 | 0.83x | $5.90 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 1994 | 1.29x | $5.40 Million | $4.20 Million | — |