Mednax Inc (MD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mednax Inc (MD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-129.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.19 Billion) in one year. See Mednax Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mednax Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mednax Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Mednax Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mednax Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mednax Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mednax Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $271.09 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $206.57 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $137.32 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $166.94 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +172.8% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $76.74 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $204.62 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $346.64 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $289.93 Million | $2.85 Billion | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $511.38 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $443.78 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $368.70 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $422.64 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2013 | 0.57x | $405.40 Million | $706.44 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2012 | 0.46x | $325.69 Million | $714.97 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2011 | 0.50x | $271.02 Million | $541.63 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $240.56 Million | $590.19 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $241.37 Million | $499.25 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $181.39 Million | $531.74 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2007 | 0.55x | $188.52 Million | $343.75 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2006 | 0.66x | $177.27 Million | $269.37 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2005 | 0.78x | $162.42 Million | $208.61 Million | ▲ +37.1% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $123.75 Million | $217.86 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2003 | 0.81x | $118.03 Million | $145.22 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2002 | 0.97x | $97.84 Million | $100.68 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.96x | $90.34 Million | $94.25 Million | ▲ +119.6% |
| 2000 | 0.44x | $36.15 Million | $82.83 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | $24.00 Million | $105.90 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 1998 | 0.53x | $33.80 Million | $63.30 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 1997 | 0.88x | $29.00 Million | $33.10 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 1996 | 0.65x | $14.80 Million | $22.70 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 1995 | 0.83x | $5.90 Million | $7.10 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 1994 | 1.29x | $5.40 Million | $4.20 Million | — |