MDU Resources Group Inc (MDU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MDU Resources Group Inc (MDU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $265.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.79 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is MDU Resources Group Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
MDU Resources Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MDU Resources Group Inc across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does MDU Resources Group Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MDU Resources Group Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MDU Resources Group Inc. Check cash flow quality index of MDU Resources Group Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $473.37 Million | $4.98 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $502.32 Million | $4.35 Billion | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $332.63 Million | $4.93 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $510.00 Million | $6.07 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $495.80 Million | $5.53 Billion | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $768.40 Million | $4.97 Billion | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $542.30 Million | $4.84 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $499.90 Million | $4.42 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $448.00 Million | $3.91 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $462.21 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $641.14 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $615.78 Million | $4.56 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $742.19 Million | $4.21 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $584.74 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $626.65 Million | $3.78 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $551.63 Million | $3.61 Billion | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $846.69 Million | $3.42 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $786.19 Million | $3.83 Billion | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $563.19 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $659.48 Million | $2.74 Billion | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $483.24 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $433.07 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $418.40 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $326.33 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $348.55 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $206.96 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $154.90 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $138.40 Million | $885.40 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $138.60 Million | $710.90 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $106.20 Million | $721.70 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 1995 | 0.18x | $124.90 Million | $702.30 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $97.80 Million | $660.50 Million | — |