MDU Resources Group Inc (MDU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MDU Resources Group Inc (MDU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $149.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.78 Billion) in one year. See MDU Resources Group Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
MDU Resources Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MDU Resources Group Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore MDU Resources Group Inc (MDU) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MDU Resources Group Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MDU Resources Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MDU Resources Group Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $473.37 Million | $4.98 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $502.32 Million | $4.35 Billion | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $332.63 Million | $4.93 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $510.00 Million | $6.07 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $495.80 Million | $5.53 Billion | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $768.40 Million | $4.97 Billion | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $542.30 Million | $4.84 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $499.90 Million | $4.42 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $448.00 Million | $3.91 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $462.21 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $641.14 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $615.78 Million | $4.56 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $742.19 Million | $4.21 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $584.74 Million | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $626.65 Million | $3.78 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $551.63 Million | $3.61 Billion | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $846.69 Million | $3.42 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $786.19 Million | $3.83 Billion | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $563.19 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2006 | 0.24x | $659.48 Million | $2.74 Billion | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $483.24 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2004 | 0.21x | $433.07 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $418.40 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $326.33 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $348.55 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $206.96 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $154.90 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $138.40 Million | $885.40 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $138.60 Million | $710.90 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $106.20 Million | $721.70 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 1995 | 0.18x | $124.90 Million | $702.30 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $97.80 Million | $660.50 Million | — |