MEDIFAST INC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MEDIFAST INC cash flow-to-debt ratio. MEDIFAST INC (MED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($64.02 Million) in one year. Check MEDIFAST INC cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of MEDIFAST INC (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of MEDIFAST INC from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for MEDIFAST INC across 30 annual periods. Check MED cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
MEDIFAST INC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
MEDIFAST INC cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MEDIFAST INC. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of MEDIFAST INC.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $6.86 Million | $58.09 Million | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2024 | 0.33x | $24.48 Million | $74.10 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2023 | 1.36x | $147.66 Million | $108.43 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2022 | 1.21x | $194.57 Million | $161.17 Million | ▲ +150.1% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | $94.55 Million | $195.85 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2020 | 1.22x | $145.20 Million | $118.84 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2019 | 0.94x | $84.26 Million | $89.82 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $60.82 Million | $60.32 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2017 | 1.16x | $43.24 Million | $37.35 Million | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2016 | 1.01x | $25.35 Million | $25.20 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2015 | 1.02x | $29.41 Million | $28.74 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $25.54 Million | $35.43 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2013 | 1.24x | $42.36 Million | $34.23 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2012 | 1.02x | $40.26 Million | $39.47 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2011 | 1.08x | $34.87 Million | $32.26 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2010 | 1.30x | $28.77 Million | $22.10 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2009 | 1.81x | $20.31 Million | $11.21 Million | ▲ +324.2% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $5.50 Million | $12.86 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2007 | 0.70x | $7.95 Million | $11.30 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2006 | 0.67x | $5.84 Million | $8.76 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | $3.21 Million | $8.52 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $2.33 Million | $6.76 Million | ▲ +41.2% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $1.75 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | $2.46 Million | $4.31 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2001 | 0.79x | $651.00K | $819.00K | ▲ +7019.0% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-22.00K | $1.92 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 1999 | -0.06x | $-148.00K | $2.33 Million | ▲ +74.3% |
| 1998 | -0.25x | $-2.03 Million | $8.19 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1997 | -0.39x | $-1.90 Million | $4.93 Million | ▼ -931.6% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-220.00K | $5.88 Million | — |