MEDIFAST INC (MED) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MEDIFAST INC (MED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $260.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($54.37 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of MEDIFAST INC to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
MEDIFAST INC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MEDIFAST INC across 30 annual periods. Also explore MEDIFAST INC equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MEDIFAST INC (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MEDIFAST INC. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MED market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $6.86 Million | $58.09 Million | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2024 | 0.33x | $24.48 Million | $74.10 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2023 | 1.36x | $147.66 Million | $108.43 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2022 | 1.21x | $194.57 Million | $161.17 Million | ▲ +150.1% |
| 2021 | 0.48x | $94.55 Million | $195.85 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2020 | 1.22x | $145.20 Million | $118.84 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2019 | 0.94x | $84.26 Million | $89.82 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $60.82 Million | $60.32 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2017 | 1.16x | $43.24 Million | $37.35 Million | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2016 | 1.01x | $25.35 Million | $25.20 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2015 | 1.02x | $29.41 Million | $28.74 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $25.54 Million | $35.43 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2013 | 1.24x | $42.36 Million | $34.23 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2012 | 1.02x | $40.26 Million | $39.47 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2011 | 1.08x | $34.87 Million | $32.26 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2010 | 1.30x | $28.77 Million | $22.10 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2009 | 1.81x | $20.31 Million | $11.21 Million | ▲ +324.2% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | $5.50 Million | $12.86 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2007 | 0.70x | $7.95 Million | $11.30 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2006 | 0.67x | $5.84 Million | $8.76 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | $3.21 Million | $8.52 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.34x | $2.33 Million | $6.76 Million | ▲ +41.2% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $1.75 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2002 | 0.57x | $2.46 Million | $4.31 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2001 | 0.79x | $651.00K | $819.00K | ▲ +7019.0% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-22.00K | $1.92 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 1999 | -0.06x | $-148.00K | $2.33 Million | ▲ +74.3% |
| 1998 | -0.25x | $-2.03 Million | $8.19 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 1997 | -0.39x | $-1.90 Million | $4.93 Million | ▼ -931.6% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-220.00K | $5.88 Million | — |