Methode Electronics Inc (MEI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Methode Electronics Inc (MEI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($631.30 Million) in one year. See Methode Electronics Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Methode Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Methode Electronics Inc across 38 annual periods. Also explore MEI year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Methode Electronics Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Methode Electronics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Methode Electronics Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $26.40 Million | $612.50 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $47.50 Million | $637.50 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $132.80 Million | $626.20 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $98.80 Million | $475.30 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | $179.80 Million | $549.00 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $140.60 Million | $587.20 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $102.00 Million | $542.00 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | $117.80 Million | $285.90 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2017 | 0.89x | $145.20 Million | $162.90 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2016 | 0.60x | $110.70 Million | $185.80 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2015 | 0.84x | $122.90 Million | $146.80 Million | ▲ +112.0% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $72.40 Million | $183.30 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $33.24 Million | $145.35 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $24.82 Million | $148.42 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $17.04 Million | $73.60 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | $27.37 Million | $70.88 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | $43.17 Million | $73.51 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | $43.17 Million | $73.51 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2008 | 0.81x | $79.00 Million | $97.85 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.81x | $79.00 Million | $97.85 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2007 | 0.64x | $56.37 Million | $87.53 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $29.65 Million | $82.87 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2005 | 0.61x | $44.95 Million | $74.16 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $44.13 Million | $65.60 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2003 | 0.87x | $52.73 Million | $60.47 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2002 | 0.66x | $40.85 Million | $62.09 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | $32.50 Million | $65.60 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2000 | 0.85x | $56.77 Million | $67.14 Million | ▲ +78.3% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | $32.30 Million | $68.10 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 1998 | 0.62x | $38.30 Million | $61.50 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 1997 | 0.80x | $44.90 Million | $56.30 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 1996 | 0.75x | $43.40 Million | $58.20 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 1995 | 0.66x | $37.30 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +105.5% |
| 1994 | 0.32x | $16.90 Million | $52.70 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 1993 | 0.42x | $18.60 Million | $44.70 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1992 | 0.55x | $21.60 Million | $39.40 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 1991 | 0.57x | $15.90 Million | $27.70 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 1990 | 0.55x | $16.40 Million | $30.00 Million | — |