Methode Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Methode Electronics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Methode Electronics Inc (MEI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($628.60 Million) in one year. Check Methode Electronics Inc (MEI) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Methode Electronics Inc (1990–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Methode Electronics Inc from 1990 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Methode Electronics Inc across 39 annual periods. Check MEI cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Methode Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2026)
Methode Electronics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Methode Electronics Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Methode Electronics Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.06x | $38.00 Million | $628.60 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2025 | 0.04x | $26.40 Million | $612.50 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $47.50 Million | $637.50 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $132.80 Million | $626.20 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $98.80 Million | $475.30 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | $179.80 Million | $549.00 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $140.60 Million | $587.20 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $102.00 Million | $542.00 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | $117.80 Million | $285.90 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2017 | 0.89x | $145.20 Million | $162.90 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2016 | 0.60x | $110.70 Million | $185.80 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2015 | 0.84x | $122.90 Million | $146.80 Million | ▲ +112.0% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $72.40 Million | $183.30 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $33.24 Million | $145.35 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $24.82 Million | $148.42 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $17.04 Million | $73.60 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | $27.37 Million | $70.88 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | $43.17 Million | $73.51 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.59x | $43.17 Million | $73.51 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2008 | 0.81x | $79.00 Million | $97.85 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.81x | $79.00 Million | $97.85 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2007 | 0.64x | $56.37 Million | $87.53 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $29.65 Million | $82.87 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2005 | 0.61x | $44.95 Million | $74.16 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $44.13 Million | $65.60 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2003 | 0.87x | $52.73 Million | $60.47 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2002 | 0.66x | $40.85 Million | $62.09 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | $32.50 Million | $65.60 Million | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2000 | 0.85x | $56.77 Million | $67.14 Million | ▲ +78.3% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | $32.30 Million | $68.10 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 1998 | 0.62x | $38.30 Million | $61.50 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 1997 | 0.80x | $44.90 Million | $56.30 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 1996 | 0.75x | $43.40 Million | $58.20 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 1995 | 0.66x | $37.30 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +105.5% |
| 1994 | 0.32x | $16.90 Million | $52.70 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 1993 | 0.42x | $18.60 Million | $44.70 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1992 | 0.55x | $21.60 Million | $39.40 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 1991 | 0.57x | $15.90 Million | $27.70 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 1990 | 0.55x | $16.40 Million | $30.00 Million | — |