Acme United Corporation (ACU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Acme United Corporation (ACU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.23 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($78.52 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Acme United Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Acme United Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Acme United Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Acme United Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Acme United Corporation (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Acme United Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ACU stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.32x | $18.23 Million | $56.99 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $11.98 Million | $55.19 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2023 | 0.56x | $28.90 Million | $51.34 Million | ▲ +1561.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $2.89 Million | $85.35 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $5.14 Million | $67.36 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $5.72 Million | $67.15 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $14.70 Million | $55.04 Million | ▲ +241.1% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $4.48 Million | $57.15 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $4.81 Million | $64.79 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $8.86 Million | $45.95 Million | ▲ +582.7% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $1.08 Million | $38.24 Million | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $4.65 Million | $39.88 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | $6.48 Million | $33.07 Million | ▲ +668.6% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-1.27 Million | $36.96 Million | ▼ -145.8% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $2.06 Million | $27.45 Million | ▲ +260.4% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-1.14 Million | $24.23 Million | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $6.58 Million | $17.77 Million | ▲ +155.6% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $3.27 Million | $22.54 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $2.71 Million | $19.18 Million | ▲ +389.5% |
| 2006 | -0.05x | $-823.39K | $16.89 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | $-438.61K | $14.13 Million | ▼ -106.5% |
| 2004 | 0.48x | $4.31 Million | $8.98 Million | ▲ +161.8% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $1.75 Million | $9.56 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $1.64 Million | $9.13 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $2.05 Million | $11.50 Million | ▲ +365.1% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $506.69K | $13.22 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $495.44K | $13.90 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $600.00K | $24.20 Million | ▲ +116.8% |
| 1997 | -0.15x | $-3.40 Million | $23.00 Million | ▼ -149.6% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | $6.20 Million | $20.80 Million | ▲ +810.8% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $900.00K | $27.50 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 1994 | 0.03x | $700.00K | $24.80 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 1993 | 0.11x | $2.70 Million | $24.00 Million | ▲ +177.9% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $1.00 Million | $24.70 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 1991 | 0.06x | $1.30 Million | $20.50 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 1990 | 0.05x | $900.00K | $18.00 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 1985 | 2.01x | $18.30 Million | $9.10 Million | — |