Arena Group Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Arena Group Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Arena Group Holdings Inc (AREN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.43 Million) in one year. Check AREN cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Arena Group Holdings Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Arena Group Holdings Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Arena Group Holdings Inc across 29 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Arena Group Holdings Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Arena Group Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Arena Group Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Arena Group Holdings Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AREN cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.33x | $39.25 Million | $117.43 Million | ▲ +612.8% |
| 2024 | -0.07x | $-16.08 Million | $246.68 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2023 | -0.10x | $-24.77 Million | $247.87 Million | ▼ -126.2% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-11.30 Million | $255.87 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | $-32.29 Million | $225.66 Million | ▲ +41.2% |
| 2020 | -0.24x | $-56.95 Million | $233.89 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2019 | -0.26x | $-56.95 Million | $216.01 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | $-7.42 Million | $29.83 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2017 | -1.17x | $-4.19 Million | $3.58 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2016 | -2.21x | $-1.14 Million | $514.82K | ▼ -267.0% |
| 2015 | -0.60x | $-153.24K | $254.47K | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2014 | -0.62x | $-160.60K | $257.28K | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2013 | -0.55x | $-143.65K | $262.73K | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2012 | -0.48x | $-141.96K | $293.64K | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2011 | -0.36x | $-98.74K | $270.67K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2010 | -0.88x | $-182.52K | $206.62K | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2009 | -0.94x | $-212.79K | $226.11K | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2008 | -1.30x | $-345.10K | $265.05K | ▲ +84.9% |
| 2007 | -8.64x | $-2.68 Million | $310.00K | ▼ -2507.9% |
| 2006 | -0.33x | $-1.39 Million | $4.18 Million | ▼ -344.9% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $1.08 Million | $7.98 Million | ▲ +344.4% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $185.65K | $6.10 Million | ▲ +122.3% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | $-972.38K | $7.14 Million | ▼ -1454.0% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-44.25K | $5.05 Million | ▲ +99.2% |
| 2000 | -1.16x | $-6.01 Million | $5.18 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1999 | -2.03x | $-8.38 Million | $4.12 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 1998 | -1.70x | $-8.67 Million | $5.11 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 1997 | -1.28x | $-4.42 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 1996 | -2.01x | $-3.43 Million | $1.71 Million | — |