Aris Mining Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aris Mining Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $99.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($977.30 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Aris Mining Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Aris Mining Corporation (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Aris Mining Corporation from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Aris Mining Corporation across 24 annual periods. Check Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Aris Mining Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Aris Mining Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aris Mining Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Aris Mining Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.11x | $96.03 Million | $911.40 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $104.70 Million | $728.22 Million | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $76.95 Million | $740.75 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $80.55 Million | $519.86 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $136.38 Million | $454.34 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | $104.34 Million | $241.77 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2018 | 0.39x | $79.74 Million | $204.18 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $50.53 Million | $225.63 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | $33.27 Million | $198.46 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $32.95 Million | $224.73 Million | ▲ +270.7% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $9.75 Million | $246.50 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | $14.65 Million | $297.79 Million | ▲ +295.0% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $4.23 Million | $339.74 Million | ▲ +116.4% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-14.45 Million | $190.86 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-6.37 Million | $50.97 Million | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2009 | -10.70x | $-207.33K | $19.37K | ▼ -2191.1% |
| 2008 | -0.47x | $-557.32K | $1.19 Million | ▼ -122750.1% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $-217.06 | $570.74K | ▲ +98.6% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-16.63K | $628.35K | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2005 | -0.06x | $-27.15K | $484.64K | ▼ -4137.5% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | $-524.02 | $396.42K | ▲ +82.8% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-2.04K | $264.74K | ▲ +88.6% |
| 2002 | -0.07x | $-15.01K | $222.47K | ▼ -244.9% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $8.34K | $179.13K | — |