Bancroft Fund Limited (BCV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bancroft Fund Limited (BCV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -26.98x as of April 2022, meaning its operating cash flow of $-34.46 Million could theoretically repay -27% of its total liabilities ($1.28 Million) in one year. See BCV financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bancroft Fund Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2021)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bancroft Fund Limited across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Bancroft Fund Limited.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bancroft Fund Limited (1991–2021)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bancroft Fund Limited. Check Bancroft Fund Limited (BCV) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 75.33x | $42.24 Million | $560.72K | ▲ +202.1% |
| 2020 | 24.94x | $26.95 Million | $1.08 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 15.97x | $23.72 Million | $1.49 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2018 | 16.50x | $7.29 Million | $442.15K | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2017 | 54.68x | $20.11 Million | $367.75K | ▲ +1987.3% |
| 2016 | 2.62x | $4.94 Million | $1.89 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 2015 | 17.03x | $2.22 Million | $130.24K | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2014 | 27.89x | $10.25 Million | $367.51K | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2013 | 110.17x | $19.06 Million | $173.00K | ▲ +4195.1% |
| 2012 | 2.57x | $6.62 Million | $2.58 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2011 | 5.81x | $1.21 Million | $208.26K | ▼ -54.9% |
| 2010 | 12.87x | $15.84 Million | $1.23 Million | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2009 | 7.25x | $20.31 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +111.6% |
| 2008 | -62.34x | $-43.64 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -541.4% |
| 2007 | 14.12x | $18.36 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2006 | 9.97x | $12.96 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2005 | 18.90x | $7.56 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +321.0% |
| 2004 | 4.49x | $4.04 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -96.9% |
| 2003 | 142.80x | $14.28 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +6308.7% |
| 2002 | -2.30x | $-5.75 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2001 | -25.30x | $-7.59 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -574.9% |
| 2000 | 5.33x | $15.45 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 1999 | 5.40x | $16.19 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 1998 | 37.60x | $3.76 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -78.9% |
| 1997 | 178.60x | $17.86 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +485.2% |
| 1996 | 30.52x | $15.26 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1995 | 101.70x | $10.17 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1993 | 118.80x | $11.88 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +3477.4% |
| 1992 | 3.32x | $7.97 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -86.2% |
| 1991 | 24.12x | $12.06 Million | $500.00K | — |