Bancroft Fund Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bancroft Fund Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Bancroft Fund Limited (BCV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -26.98x as of April 2022, meaning its operating cash flow of $-34.46 Million could theoretically repay -27% of its total liabilities ($1.28 Million) in one year. Check BCV operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Bancroft Fund Limited (1991–2021)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Bancroft Fund Limited from 1991 to 2021. Historical debt coverage capacity for Bancroft Fund Limited across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Bancroft Fund Limited to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Bancroft Fund Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2021)
Bancroft Fund Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2021. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bancroft Fund Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Bancroft Fund Limited generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 75.33x | $42.24 Million | $560.72K | ▲ +202.1% |
| 2020 | 24.94x | $26.95 Million | $1.08 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 15.97x | $23.72 Million | $1.49 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2018 | 16.50x | $7.29 Million | $442.15K | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2017 | 54.68x | $20.11 Million | $367.75K | ▲ +1987.3% |
| 2016 | 2.62x | $4.94 Million | $1.89 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 2015 | 17.03x | $2.22 Million | $130.24K | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2014 | 27.89x | $10.25 Million | $367.51K | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2013 | 110.17x | $19.06 Million | $173.00K | ▲ +4195.1% |
| 2012 | 2.57x | $6.62 Million | $2.58 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2011 | 5.81x | $1.21 Million | $208.26K | ▼ -54.9% |
| 2010 | 12.87x | $15.84 Million | $1.23 Million | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2009 | 7.25x | $20.31 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +111.6% |
| 2008 | -62.34x | $-43.64 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -541.4% |
| 2007 | 14.12x | $18.36 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2006 | 9.97x | $12.96 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2005 | 18.90x | $7.56 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +321.0% |
| 2004 | 4.49x | $4.04 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -96.9% |
| 2003 | 142.80x | $14.28 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +6308.7% |
| 2002 | -2.30x | $-5.75 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2001 | -25.30x | $-7.59 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -574.9% |
| 2000 | 5.33x | $15.45 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 1999 | 5.40x | $16.19 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 1998 | 37.60x | $3.76 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -78.9% |
| 1997 | 178.60x | $17.86 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +485.2% |
| 1996 | 30.52x | $15.26 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1995 | 101.70x | $10.17 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1993 | 118.80x | $11.88 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +3477.4% |
| 1992 | 3.32x | $7.97 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -86.2% |
| 1991 | 24.12x | $12.06 Million | $500.00K | — |