Bancroft Fund Limited (BCV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bancroft Fund Limited (BCV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -26.98x as of April 2022, meaning its operating cash flow of $-34.46 Million could theoretically repay -27% of its total liabilities ($1.28 Million) in one year. See Bancroft Fund Limited free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bancroft Fund Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2021)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bancroft Fund Limited across 30 annual periods. Also explore BCV net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bancroft Fund Limited (1991–2021)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bancroft Fund Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Bancroft Fund Limited worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 75.33x | $42.24 Million | $560.72K | ▲ +202.1% |
| 2020 | 24.94x | $26.95 Million | $1.08 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 15.97x | $23.72 Million | $1.49 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2018 | 16.50x | $7.29 Million | $442.15K | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2017 | 54.68x | $20.11 Million | $367.75K | ▲ +1987.3% |
| 2016 | 2.62x | $4.94 Million | $1.89 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 2015 | 17.03x | $2.22 Million | $130.24K | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2014 | 27.89x | $10.25 Million | $367.51K | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2013 | 110.17x | $19.06 Million | $173.00K | ▲ +4195.1% |
| 2012 | 2.57x | $6.62 Million | $2.58 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2011 | 5.81x | $1.21 Million | $208.26K | ▼ -54.9% |
| 2010 | 12.87x | $15.84 Million | $1.23 Million | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2009 | 7.25x | $20.31 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +111.6% |
| 2008 | -62.34x | $-43.64 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -541.4% |
| 2007 | 14.12x | $18.36 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2006 | 9.97x | $12.96 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2005 | 18.90x | $7.56 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +321.0% |
| 2004 | 4.49x | $4.04 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -96.9% |
| 2003 | 142.80x | $14.28 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +6308.7% |
| 2002 | -2.30x | $-5.75 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2001 | -25.30x | $-7.59 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -574.9% |
| 2000 | 5.33x | $15.45 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 1999 | 5.40x | $16.19 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -85.6% |
| 1998 | 37.60x | $3.76 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -78.9% |
| 1997 | 178.60x | $17.86 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +485.2% |
| 1996 | 30.52x | $15.26 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1995 | 101.70x | $10.17 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1993 | 118.80x | $11.88 Million | $100.00K | ▲ +3477.4% |
| 1992 | 3.32x | $7.97 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -86.2% |
| 1991 | 24.12x | $12.06 Million | $500.00K | — |