Perspective Therapeutics Inc. (CATX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.50x

Perspective Therapeutics Inc. (CATX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.50x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-31.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($63.33 Million) in one year. See CATX free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.50x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-31.47 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$63.33 Million
USD

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Perspective Therapeutics Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Perspective Therapeutics Inc. across 58 annual periods. Also explore Perspective Therapeutics Inc. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Perspective Therapeutics Inc. (1994–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Perspective Therapeutics Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Perspective Therapeutics Inc..

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -1.38x $-82.48 Million $59.94 Million ▼ -279.4%
2024 -0.36x $-18.29 Million $50.43 Million ▲ +77.7%
2023 -1.63x $-36.91 Million $22.71 Million ▲ +53.9%
2023 -3.53x $-12.17 Million $3.45 Million ▲ +0.0%
2022 -3.53x $-12.17 Million $3.45 Million ▼ -44.7%
2022 -2.44x $-7.71 Million $3.16 Million ▲ +0.0%
2021 -2.44x $-7.71 Million $3.16 Million ▼ -158.7%
2021 -0.94x $-2.84 Million $3.01 Million ▲ +9.0%
2020 -1.04x $-2.84 Million $2.74 Million ▲ +15.4%
2020 -1.22x $-3.64 Million $2.98 Million ▲ +0.0%
2019 -1.22x $-3.64 Million $2.98 Million ▲ +57.8%
2019 -2.90x $-5.05 Million $1.74 Million ▲ +0.0%
2018 -2.90x $-5.05 Million $1.74 Million ▼ -23.0%
2018 -2.36x $-5.71 Million $2.42 Million ▲ +31.3%
2017 -3.43x $-5.71 Million $1.67 Million ▲ +0.0%
2017 -3.43x $-5.71 Million $1.67 Million ▼ -50.0%
2016 -2.28x $-3.88 Million $1.70 Million ▲ +0.0%
2016 -2.28x $-3.88 Million $1.70 Million ▼ -44.0%
2015 -1.59x $-3.52 Million $2.22 Million ▲ +0.0%
2015 -1.59x $-3.52 Million $2.22 Million ▼ -27.4%
2014 -1.24x $-3.23 Million $2.59 Million ▲ +0.0%
2014 -1.24x $-3.23 Million $2.59 Million ▲ +31.2%
2013 -1.81x $-3.06 Million $1.69 Million ▲ +0.0%
2013 -1.81x $-3.06 Million $1.69 Million ▼ -24.7%
2012 -1.45x $-2.45 Million $1.69 Million ▲ +0.0%
2012 -1.45x $-2.45 Million $1.69 Million ▲ +13.9%
2011 -1.68x $-2.42 Million $1.44 Million ▲ +0.0%
2011 -1.68x $-2.42 Million $1.44 Million ▼ -9.5%
2010 -1.54x $-2.69 Million $1.75 Million ▲ +0.0%
2010 -1.54x $-2.69 Million $1.75 Million ▲ +30.7%
2009 -2.22x $-3.95 Million $1.78 Million ▲ +0.0%
2009 -2.22x $-3.95 Million $1.78 Million ▲ +41.5%
2008 -3.79x $-7.73 Million $2.04 Million ▲ +0.0%
2008 -3.79x $-7.73 Million $2.04 Million ▼ -76.9%
2007 -2.14x $-7.20 Million $3.36 Million ▲ +0.0%
2007 -2.14x $-7.20 Million $3.36 Million ▲ +15.2%
2006 -2.53x $-7.00 Million $2.77 Million ▲ +0.0%
2006 -2.53x $-7.00 Million $2.77 Million ▼ -547581.5%
2005 0.00x $-9.86K $21.36 Million ▲ +99.7%
2004 -0.16x $-3.39 Million $21.36 Million ▼ -371.0%
2004 -0.03x $-19.02K $565.13K ▼ -311.6%
2003 -0.01x $-8.87K $1.08 Million ▲ +0.0%
2003 -0.01x $-8.87K $1.08 Million ▲ +42.6%
2002 -0.01x $-14.73K $1.03 Million ▼ -98.7%
2002 -0.01x $-7.42K $1.03 Million ▼ -24.2%
2001 -0.01x $-7.42K $1.28 Million ▼ -101.9%
2000 0.30x $365.34K $1.23 Million ▲ +257.6%
1999 0.08x $275.97K $3.31 Million ▼ -63.0%
1999 0.23x $275.97K $1.23 Million ▲ +6607.1%
1998 0.00x $-11.71K $3.38 Million ▲ +2.2%
1998 0.00x $-11.71K $3.31 Million ▲ +98.8%
1997 -0.30x $-1.08 Million $3.64 Million ▲ +7.1%
1997 -0.32x $-1.08 Million $3.38 Million ▼ -66.3%
1996 -0.19x $-501.83K $2.61 Million ▼ -39.8%
1996 -0.14x $-501.83K $3.64 Million ▲ +31.4%
1995 -0.20x $-518.19K $2.58 Million ▼ -1.0%
1995 -0.20x $-518.19K $2.61 Million ▲ +1.0%
1994 -0.20x $-518.19K $2.58 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.