Perspective Therapeutics Inc. (CATX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.50x

Perspective Therapeutics Inc. (CATX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.50x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-31.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($63.33 Million) in one year. Check Perspective Therapeutics Inc. total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.50x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-31.47 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$63.33 Million
USD

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Perspective Therapeutics Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Perspective Therapeutics Inc. across 58 annual periods. Check Perspective Therapeutics Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Perspective Therapeutics Inc. (1994–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Perspective Therapeutics Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CATX cash generation efficiency.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -1.38x $-82.48 Million $59.94 Million ▼ -279.4%
2024 -0.36x $-18.29 Million $50.43 Million ▲ +77.7%
2023 -1.63x $-36.91 Million $22.71 Million ▲ +53.9%
2023 -3.53x $-12.17 Million $3.45 Million ▲ +0.0%
2022 -3.53x $-12.17 Million $3.45 Million ▼ -44.7%
2022 -2.44x $-7.71 Million $3.16 Million ▲ +0.0%
2021 -2.44x $-7.71 Million $3.16 Million ▼ -158.7%
2021 -0.94x $-2.84 Million $3.01 Million ▲ +9.0%
2020 -1.04x $-2.84 Million $2.74 Million ▲ +15.4%
2020 -1.22x $-3.64 Million $2.98 Million ▲ +0.0%
2019 -1.22x $-3.64 Million $2.98 Million ▲ +57.8%
2019 -2.90x $-5.05 Million $1.74 Million ▲ +0.0%
2018 -2.90x $-5.05 Million $1.74 Million ▼ -23.0%
2018 -2.36x $-5.71 Million $2.42 Million ▲ +31.3%
2017 -3.43x $-5.71 Million $1.67 Million ▲ +0.0%
2017 -3.43x $-5.71 Million $1.67 Million ▼ -50.0%
2016 -2.28x $-3.88 Million $1.70 Million ▲ +0.0%
2016 -2.28x $-3.88 Million $1.70 Million ▼ -44.0%
2015 -1.59x $-3.52 Million $2.22 Million ▲ +0.0%
2015 -1.59x $-3.52 Million $2.22 Million ▼ -27.4%
2014 -1.24x $-3.23 Million $2.59 Million ▲ +0.0%
2014 -1.24x $-3.23 Million $2.59 Million ▲ +31.2%
2013 -1.81x $-3.06 Million $1.69 Million ▲ +0.0%
2013 -1.81x $-3.06 Million $1.69 Million ▼ -24.7%
2012 -1.45x $-2.45 Million $1.69 Million ▲ +0.0%
2012 -1.45x $-2.45 Million $1.69 Million ▲ +13.9%
2011 -1.68x $-2.42 Million $1.44 Million ▲ +0.0%
2011 -1.68x $-2.42 Million $1.44 Million ▼ -9.5%
2010 -1.54x $-2.69 Million $1.75 Million ▲ +0.0%
2010 -1.54x $-2.69 Million $1.75 Million ▲ +30.7%
2009 -2.22x $-3.95 Million $1.78 Million ▲ +0.0%
2009 -2.22x $-3.95 Million $1.78 Million ▲ +41.5%
2008 -3.79x $-7.73 Million $2.04 Million ▲ +0.0%
2008 -3.79x $-7.73 Million $2.04 Million ▼ -76.9%
2007 -2.14x $-7.20 Million $3.36 Million ▲ +0.0%
2007 -2.14x $-7.20 Million $3.36 Million ▲ +15.2%
2006 -2.53x $-7.00 Million $2.77 Million ▲ +0.0%
2006 -2.53x $-7.00 Million $2.77 Million ▼ -547581.5%
2005 0.00x $-9.86K $21.36 Million ▲ +99.7%
2004 -0.16x $-3.39 Million $21.36 Million ▼ -371.0%
2004 -0.03x $-19.02K $565.13K ▼ -311.6%
2003 -0.01x $-8.87K $1.08 Million ▲ +0.0%
2003 -0.01x $-8.87K $1.08 Million ▲ +42.6%
2002 -0.01x $-14.73K $1.03 Million ▼ -98.7%
2002 -0.01x $-7.42K $1.03 Million ▼ -24.2%
2001 -0.01x $-7.42K $1.28 Million ▼ -101.9%
2000 0.30x $365.34K $1.23 Million ▲ +257.6%
1999 0.08x $275.97K $3.31 Million ▼ -63.0%
1999 0.23x $275.97K $1.23 Million ▲ +6607.1%
1998 0.00x $-11.71K $3.38 Million ▲ +2.2%
1998 0.00x $-11.71K $3.31 Million ▲ +98.8%
1997 -0.30x $-1.08 Million $3.64 Million ▲ +7.1%
1997 -0.32x $-1.08 Million $3.38 Million ▼ -66.3%
1996 -0.19x $-501.83K $2.61 Million ▼ -39.8%
1996 -0.14x $-501.83K $3.64 Million ▲ +31.4%
1995 -0.20x $-518.19K $2.58 Million ▼ -1.0%
1995 -0.20x $-518.19K $2.61 Million ▲ +1.0%
1994 -0.20x $-518.19K $2.58 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.