AMCON Distributing Company (DIT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AMCON Distributing Company (DIT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($282.10 Million) in one year. Explore how much of AMCON Distributing Company's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
AMCON Distributing Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for AMCON Distributing Company across 30 annual periods. Also explore AMCON Distributing Company (DIT) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for AMCON Distributing Company (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AMCON Distributing Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DIT market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $18.67 Million | $278.02 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2024 | 0.26x | $67.87 Million | $262.38 Million | ▲ +240.1% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $19.72 Million | $259.26 Million | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $22.89 Million | $196.30 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $20.94 Million | $110.80 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $15.20 Million | $123.21 Million | ▲ +204.5% |
| 2019 | -0.12x | $-11.45 Million | $96.95 Million | ▼ -251.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $5.90 Million | $75.35 Million | ▲ +136.2% |
| 2017 | -0.22x | $-13.76 Million | $63.64 Million | ▼ -154.7% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | $18.39 Million | $46.51 Million | ▲ +963.4% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-2.56 Million | $55.92 Million | ▼ -130.1% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $7.66 Million | $50.34 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $5.73 Million | $50.73 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $9.90 Million | $57.35 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $16.01 Million | $65.73 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $10.39 Million | $59.29 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | $17.88 Million | $64.36 Million | ▲ +343.9% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $5.15 Million | $82.34 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $8.66 Million | $86.52 Million | ▲ +2917.8% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-343.32K | $96.61 Million | ▼ -103.8% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $8.53 Million | $91.24 Million | ▲ +346.1% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-3.66 Million | $96.43 Million | ▼ -156.4% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $5.54 Million | $82.20 Million | ▲ +176.1% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $2.14 Million | $87.89 Million | ▼ -63.0% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $5.66 Million | $85.83 Million | ▲ +218.4% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | $-3.13 Million | $56.14 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $2.40 Million | $55.30 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $700.00K | $30.00 Million | ▼ -65.4% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $1.10 Million | $16.30 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $2.60 Million | $16.50 Million | — |