Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($101.72 Million) in one year. See Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EPM cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc. Check Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $33.05 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $22.73 Million | $81.75 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2023 | 1.26x | $51.27 Million | $40.56 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2022 | 0.72x | $52.46 Million | $72.53 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $4.73 Million | $22.11 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $12.40 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 1.54x | $24.06 Million | $15.64 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2018 | 1.25x | $20.54 Million | $16.37 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2017 | 0.83x | $16.49 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2016 | 1.45x | $30.65 Million | $21.13 Million | ▲ +197.8% |
| 2015 | 0.49x | $10.38 Million | $21.31 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2014 | 0.63x | $8.33 Million | $13.14 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2013 | 1.02x | $11.93 Million | $11.72 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2012 | 0.84x | $10.38 Million | $12.33 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $3.06 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $2.35 Million | $5.72 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $5.95 Million | $6.07 Million | ▲ +936.5% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-863.04K | $7.36 Million | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2007 | -6.83x | $-14.49 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -16406.7% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-737.20K | $17.83 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2005 | -0.27x | $-1.08 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -551.2% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-53.45K | $1.28 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2003 | -0.75x | $-202.78K | $271.59K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2002 | -23.38x | $-207.35K | $8.87K | ▼ -2101.5% |
| 2001 | -1.06x | $-46.47K | $43.75K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2000 | -26.96x | $-475.52K | $17.64K | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1999 | -13.71x | $-1.67 Million | $121.74K | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1998 | -9.34x | $-3.27 Million | $349.93K | ▲ +54.8% |
| 1997 | -20.67x | $-6.20 Million | $300.00K | — |