Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($101.72 Million) in one year. See Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $33.05 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $22.73 Million | $81.75 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2023 | 1.26x | $51.27 Million | $40.56 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2022 | 0.72x | $52.46 Million | $72.53 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $4.73 Million | $22.11 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $12.40 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 1.54x | $24.06 Million | $15.64 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2018 | 1.25x | $20.54 Million | $16.37 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2017 | 0.83x | $16.49 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2016 | 1.45x | $30.65 Million | $21.13 Million | ▲ +197.8% |
| 2015 | 0.49x | $10.38 Million | $21.31 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2014 | 0.63x | $8.33 Million | $13.14 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2013 | 1.02x | $11.93 Million | $11.72 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2012 | 0.84x | $10.38 Million | $12.33 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $3.06 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $2.35 Million | $5.72 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $5.95 Million | $6.07 Million | ▲ +936.5% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-863.04K | $7.36 Million | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2007 | -6.83x | $-14.49 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -16406.7% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-737.20K | $17.83 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2005 | -0.27x | $-1.08 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -551.2% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-53.45K | $1.28 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2003 | -0.75x | $-202.78K | $271.59K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2002 | -23.38x | $-207.35K | $8.87K | ▼ -2101.5% |
| 2001 | -1.06x | $-46.47K | $43.75K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2000 | -26.96x | $-475.52K | $17.64K | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1999 | -13.71x | $-1.67 Million | $121.74K | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1998 | -9.34x | $-3.27 Million | $349.93K | ▲ +54.8% |
| 1997 | -20.67x | $-6.20 Million | $300.00K | — |