Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($101.72 Million) in one year. Check EPM cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc across 29 annual periods. Check Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $33.05 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $22.73 Million | $81.75 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2023 | 1.26x | $51.27 Million | $40.56 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2022 | 0.72x | $52.46 Million | $72.53 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $4.73 Million | $22.11 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $12.40 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 1.54x | $24.06 Million | $15.64 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2018 | 1.25x | $20.54 Million | $16.37 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2017 | 0.83x | $16.49 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2016 | 1.45x | $30.65 Million | $21.13 Million | ▲ +197.8% |
| 2015 | 0.49x | $10.38 Million | $21.31 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2014 | 0.63x | $8.33 Million | $13.14 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2013 | 1.02x | $11.93 Million | $11.72 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2012 | 0.84x | $10.38 Million | $12.33 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $3.06 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $2.35 Million | $5.72 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $5.95 Million | $6.07 Million | ▲ +936.5% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-863.04K | $7.36 Million | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2007 | -6.83x | $-14.49 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -16406.7% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-737.20K | $17.83 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2005 | -0.27x | $-1.08 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -551.2% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-53.45K | $1.28 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2003 | -0.75x | $-202.78K | $271.59K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2002 | -23.38x | $-207.35K | $8.87K | ▼ -2101.5% |
| 2001 | -1.06x | $-46.47K | $43.75K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2000 | -26.96x | $-475.52K | $17.64K | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1999 | -13.71x | $-1.67 Million | $121.74K | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1998 | -9.34x | $-3.27 Million | $349.93K | ▲ +54.8% |
| 1997 | -20.67x | $-6.20 Million | $300.00K | — |