Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (EPM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($101.72 Million) in one year. Explore EPM long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Evolution Petroleum Corporation Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $33.05 Million | $88.44 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $22.73 Million | $81.75 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2023 | 1.26x | $51.27 Million | $40.56 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2022 | 0.72x | $52.46 Million | $72.53 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $4.73 Million | $22.11 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $12.40 Million | $18.01 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 1.54x | $24.06 Million | $15.64 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2018 | 1.25x | $20.54 Million | $16.37 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2017 | 0.83x | $16.49 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2016 | 1.45x | $30.65 Million | $21.13 Million | ▲ +197.8% |
| 2015 | 0.49x | $10.38 Million | $21.31 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2014 | 0.63x | $8.33 Million | $13.14 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2013 | 1.02x | $11.93 Million | $11.72 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2012 | 0.84x | $10.38 Million | $12.33 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $3.06 Million | $6.70 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $2.35 Million | $5.72 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2009 | 0.98x | $5.95 Million | $6.07 Million | ▲ +936.5% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-863.04K | $7.36 Million | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2007 | -6.83x | $-14.49 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -16406.7% |
| 2006 | -0.04x | $-737.20K | $17.83 Million | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2005 | -0.27x | $-1.08 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -551.2% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | $-53.45K | $1.28 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2003 | -0.75x | $-202.78K | $271.59K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2002 | -23.38x | $-207.35K | $8.87K | ▼ -2101.5% |
| 2001 | -1.06x | $-46.47K | $43.75K | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2000 | -26.96x | $-475.52K | $17.64K | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1999 | -13.71x | $-1.67 Million | $121.74K | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1998 | -9.34x | $-3.27 Million | $349.93K | ▲ +54.8% |
| 1997 | -20.67x | $-6.20 Million | $300.00K | — |