Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio. Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $434.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($172.02 Million) in one year. Check FRD cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock across 34 annual periods. Check Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | $-4.41 Million | $94.40 Million | ▼ -196.2% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $4.98 Million | $102.54 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2023 | 0.76x | $63.89 Million | $83.88 Million | ▲ +552.5% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-13.40 Million | $79.59 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $8.43 Million | $29.67 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2020 | 1.04x | $11.23 Million | $10.85 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2019 | 0.68x | $9.63 Million | $14.12 Million | ▲ +137.7% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $3.25 Million | $11.31 Million | ▲ +511.6% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-202.66K | $2.91 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2016 | 0.83x | $3.03 Million | $3.65 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2015 | -1.70x | $-6.37 Million | $3.74 Million | ▼ -628.2% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $2.89 Million | $8.97 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2013 | 0.84x | $11.50 Million | $13.62 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2012 | 0.56x | $8.45 Million | $15.15 Million | ▲ +186.1% |
| 2011 | -0.65x | $-6.99 Million | $10.78 Million | ▼ -237.1% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $4.10 Million | $8.67 Million | ▼ -91.9% |
| 2009 | 5.86x | $25.46 Million | $4.35 Million | ▲ +10733.8% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $1.19 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $6.80 Million | $23.76 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $8.54 Million | $18.83 Million | ▲ +182.7% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $2.48 Million | $15.44 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $3.03 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +1654.2% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $153.49K | $11.53 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $9.07 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +144.0% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $4.86 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +288.9% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-2.40 Million | $16.48 Million | ▼ -129.1% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $6.80 Million | $13.60 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $3.80 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.40 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +244.1% |
| 1995 | -0.13x | $-1.80 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1994 | -0.12x | $-1.20 Million | $9.80 Million | ▼ -344.9% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $200.00K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 1992 | 0.33x | $1.10 Million | $3.30 Million | — |