Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $434.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($172.02 Million) in one year. See FRD FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FRD operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock. Check Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | $-4.41 Million | $94.40 Million | ▼ -196.2% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $4.98 Million | $102.54 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2023 | 0.76x | $63.89 Million | $83.88 Million | ▲ +552.5% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-13.40 Million | $79.59 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $8.43 Million | $29.67 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2020 | 1.04x | $11.23 Million | $10.85 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2019 | 0.68x | $9.63 Million | $14.12 Million | ▲ +137.7% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $3.25 Million | $11.31 Million | ▲ +511.6% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-202.66K | $2.91 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2016 | 0.83x | $3.03 Million | $3.65 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2015 | -1.70x | $-6.37 Million | $3.74 Million | ▼ -628.2% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $2.89 Million | $8.97 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2013 | 0.84x | $11.50 Million | $13.62 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2012 | 0.56x | $8.45 Million | $15.15 Million | ▲ +186.1% |
| 2011 | -0.65x | $-6.99 Million | $10.78 Million | ▼ -237.1% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $4.10 Million | $8.67 Million | ▼ -91.9% |
| 2009 | 5.86x | $25.46 Million | $4.35 Million | ▲ +10733.8% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $1.19 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $6.80 Million | $23.76 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $8.54 Million | $18.83 Million | ▲ +182.7% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $2.48 Million | $15.44 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $3.03 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +1654.2% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $153.49K | $11.53 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $9.07 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +144.0% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $4.86 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +288.9% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-2.40 Million | $16.48 Million | ▼ -129.1% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $6.80 Million | $13.60 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $3.80 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.40 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +244.1% |
| 1995 | -0.13x | $-1.80 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1994 | -0.12x | $-1.20 Million | $9.80 Million | ▼ -344.9% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $200.00K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 1992 | 0.33x | $1.10 Million | $3.30 Million | — |