GEE Group Inc (JOB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GEE Group Inc (JOB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.97 Million) in one year. Check GEE Group Inc (JOB) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
GEE Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for GEE Group Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore total assets of GEE Group Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for GEE Group Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GEE Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GEE Group Inc (JOB) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $549.00K | $9.99 Million | ▲ +218.1% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $202.00K | $11.69 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $5.89 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $9.23 Million | $18.55 Million | ▲ +4850.7% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $370.00K | $36.82 Million | ▲ +141.4% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-2.25 Million | $92.64 Million | ▼ -609.7% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-394.00K | $115.27 Million | ▼ -125.5% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $1.51 Million | $112.50 Million | ▲ +610.5% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $222.00K | $117.75 Million | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $723.00K | $21.39 Million | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-650.00K | $7.64 Million | ▼ -331.5% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $286.00K | $7.78 Million | ▲ +129.6% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | $-1.07 Million | $8.62 Million | ▼ -1027.9% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $95.00K | $7.09 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2011 | -0.34x | $-2.29 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2010 | -1.03x | $-1.86 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2009 | -1.31x | $-2.69 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2008 | -0.80x | $-1.55 Million | $1.93 Million | ▼ -256.3% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | $1.31 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | $1.00 Million | $2.42 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | $857.00K | $2.51 Million | ▲ +534.0% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-167.00K | $2.13 Million | ▲ +76.6% |
| 2003 | -0.34x | $-728.00K | $2.17 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2002 | -1.46x | $-2.85 Million | $1.94 Million | ▼ -169.1% |
| 2001 | -0.54x | $-1.42 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -217.2% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $2.71 Million | $5.84 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 1999 | 0.54x | $2.70 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 1998 | 0.60x | $3.20 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +36.5% |
| 1997 | 0.44x | $2.30 Million | $5.20 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 1996 | 0.52x | $2.50 Million | $4.80 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 1995 | 0.36x | $1.20 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $1.00 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +275.0% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $200.00K | $2.10 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 1991 | -0.57x | $-1.60 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -709.5% |
| 1990 | 0.09x | $300.00K | $3.20 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 1989 | 0.28x | $900.00K | $3.20 Million | — |