GEE Group Inc (JOB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GEE Group Inc (JOB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.97 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is GEE Group Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
GEE Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for GEE Group Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GEE Group Inc (JOB) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for GEE Group Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GEE Group Inc. Check JOB cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $549.00K | $9.99 Million | ▲ +218.1% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $202.00K | $11.69 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $5.89 Million | $14.19 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $9.23 Million | $18.55 Million | ▲ +4850.7% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $370.00K | $36.82 Million | ▲ +141.4% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-2.25 Million | $92.64 Million | ▼ -609.7% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-394.00K | $115.27 Million | ▼ -125.5% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $1.51 Million | $112.50 Million | ▲ +610.5% |
| 2017 | 0.00x | $222.00K | $117.75 Million | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | $723.00K | $21.39 Million | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-650.00K | $7.64 Million | ▼ -331.5% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $286.00K | $7.78 Million | ▲ +129.6% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | $-1.07 Million | $8.62 Million | ▼ -1027.9% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $95.00K | $7.09 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2011 | -0.34x | $-2.29 Million | $6.80 Million | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2010 | -1.03x | $-1.86 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2009 | -1.31x | $-2.69 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2008 | -0.80x | $-1.55 Million | $1.93 Million | ▼ -256.3% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | $1.31 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | $1.00 Million | $2.42 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | $857.00K | $2.51 Million | ▲ +534.0% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-167.00K | $2.13 Million | ▲ +76.6% |
| 2003 | -0.34x | $-728.00K | $2.17 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2002 | -1.46x | $-2.85 Million | $1.94 Million | ▼ -169.1% |
| 2001 | -0.54x | $-1.42 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -217.2% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | $2.71 Million | $5.84 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 1999 | 0.54x | $2.70 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 1998 | 0.60x | $3.20 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +36.5% |
| 1997 | 0.44x | $2.30 Million | $5.20 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 1996 | 0.52x | $2.50 Million | $4.80 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 1995 | 0.36x | $1.20 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $1.00 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +275.0% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $200.00K | $2.10 Million | ▲ +116.7% |
| 1991 | -0.57x | $-1.60 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -709.5% |
| 1990 | 0.09x | $300.00K | $3.20 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 1989 | 0.28x | $900.00K | $3.20 Million | — |