Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.66x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $863.28K could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($1.30 Million) in one year. Explore Mexco Energy Corporation long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mexco Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mexco Energy Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore MXC total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mexco Energy Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mexco Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mexco Energy Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.61x | $4.27 Million | $1.64 Million | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2024 | 1.45x | $4.43 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -78.1% |
| 2023 | 6.60x | $6.52 Million | $987.80K | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2022 | 3.53x | $3.74 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +898.7% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $710.05K | $2.01 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2020 | 0.51x | $864.96K | $1.71 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2019 | 0.99x | $1.01 Million | $1.02 Million | ▲ +349.9% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $441.02K | $2.00 Million | ▲ +183.1% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $312.08K | $4.01 Million | ▲ +216.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $175.50K | $7.12 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.18 Million | $8.26 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $1.81 Million | $4.52 Million | ▲ +146.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $811.87K | $5.00 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $1.57 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.39x | $1.34 Million | $3.44 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $1.16 Million | $2.39 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2009 | 0.78x | $2.79 Million | $3.58 Million | ▲ +150.9% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $1.47 Million | $4.74 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $1.33 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2006 | 0.91x | $1.90 Million | $2.08 Million | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2005 | 0.45x | $1.45 Million | $3.24 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2004 | 0.55x | $1.52 Million | $2.74 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2003 | 0.50x | $1.37 Million | $2.73 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2002 | 0.43x | $899.98K | $2.07 Million | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2001 | 2.08x | $1.90 Million | $914.91K | ▲ +270.5% |
| 2000 | 0.56x | $722.09K | $1.29 Million | ▲ +97.2% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $532.17K | $1.87 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1998 | 0.58x | $1.12 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $866.93K | $2.19 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 1996 | 5.93x | $396.41K | $66.89K | — |