Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.66x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $863.28K could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($1.30 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Mexco Energy Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mexco Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mexco Energy Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Mexco Energy Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mexco Energy Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mexco Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.61x | $4.27 Million | $1.64 Million | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2024 | 1.45x | $4.43 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -78.1% |
| 2023 | 6.60x | $6.52 Million | $987.80K | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2022 | 3.53x | $3.74 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +898.7% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $710.05K | $2.01 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2020 | 0.51x | $864.96K | $1.71 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2019 | 0.99x | $1.01 Million | $1.02 Million | ▲ +349.9% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $441.02K | $2.00 Million | ▲ +183.1% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $312.08K | $4.01 Million | ▲ +216.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $175.50K | $7.12 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.18 Million | $8.26 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2014 | 0.40x | $1.81 Million | $4.52 Million | ▲ +146.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $811.87K | $5.00 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $1.57 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.39x | $1.34 Million | $3.44 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $1.16 Million | $2.39 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2009 | 0.78x | $2.79 Million | $3.58 Million | ▲ +150.9% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $1.47 Million | $4.74 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $1.33 Million | $2.18 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2006 | 0.91x | $1.90 Million | $2.08 Million | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2005 | 0.45x | $1.45 Million | $3.24 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2004 | 0.55x | $1.52 Million | $2.74 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2003 | 0.50x | $1.37 Million | $2.73 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2002 | 0.43x | $899.98K | $2.07 Million | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2001 | 2.08x | $1.90 Million | $914.91K | ▲ +270.5% |
| 2000 | 0.56x | $722.09K | $1.29 Million | ▲ +97.2% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $532.17K | $1.87 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 1998 | 0.58x | $1.12 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +45.2% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $866.93K | $2.19 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 1996 | 5.93x | $396.41K | $66.89K | — |