Retractable Technologies Inc (RVP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Retractable Technologies Inc (RVP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-596.54K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($68.26 Million) in one year. See Retractable Technologies Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Retractable Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Retractable Technologies Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore Retractable Technologies Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Retractable Technologies Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Retractable Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Retractable Technologies Inc (RVP) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | $-7.06 Million | $68.26 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2024 | -0.16x | $-11.56 Million | $73.55 Million | ▼ -556.5% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $2.77 Million | $80.38 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $16.77 Million | $104.21 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $32.79 Million | $113.98 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $19.00 Million | $55.09 Million | ▲ +171.7% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $2.19 Million | $17.29 Million | ▲ +218.7% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-1.20 Million | $11.18 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2017 | -0.27x | $-2.92 Million | $10.98 Million | ▼ -257.3% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | $-794.91K | $10.67 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2015 | -0.28x | $-3.25 Million | $11.51 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | $-3.87 Million | $18.52 Million | ▼ -243.8% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $2.93 Million | $20.20 Million | ▲ +991.9% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $158.34K | $11.90 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $5.51 Million | $10.11 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2010 | 0.61x | $8.73 Million | $14.29 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2009 | -0.68x | $-12.30 Million | $18.02 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | $-5.92 Million | $16.33 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2007 | -0.34x | $-4.22 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | $-3.35 Million | $11.08 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2005 | -0.21x | $-2.23 Million | $10.52 Million | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2004 | 4.40x | $56.48 Million | $12.83 Million | ▲ +364.1% |
| 2003 | 0.95x | $8.06 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +752.7% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | $-1.54 Million | $10.62 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2001 | -0.20x | $-3.67 Million | $18.38 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2000 | -0.63x | $-8.28 Million | $13.12 Million | — |