Retractable Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Retractable Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Retractable Technologies Inc (RVP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-596.54K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($68.26 Million) in one year. Check Retractable Technologies Inc (RVP) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Retractable Technologies Inc (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Retractable Technologies Inc from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Retractable Technologies Inc across 26 annual periods. Check Retractable Technologies Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Retractable Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Retractable Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Retractable Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Retractable Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | $-7.06 Million | $68.26 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2024 | -0.16x | $-11.56 Million | $73.55 Million | ▼ -556.5% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $2.77 Million | $80.38 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $16.77 Million | $104.21 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $32.79 Million | $113.98 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $19.00 Million | $55.09 Million | ▲ +171.7% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $2.19 Million | $17.29 Million | ▲ +218.7% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-1.20 Million | $11.18 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2017 | -0.27x | $-2.92 Million | $10.98 Million | ▼ -257.3% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | $-794.91K | $10.67 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2015 | -0.28x | $-3.25 Million | $11.51 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | $-3.87 Million | $18.52 Million | ▼ -243.8% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $2.93 Million | $20.20 Million | ▲ +991.9% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $158.34K | $11.90 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $5.51 Million | $10.11 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2010 | 0.61x | $8.73 Million | $14.29 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2009 | -0.68x | $-12.30 Million | $18.02 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | $-5.92 Million | $16.33 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2007 | -0.34x | $-4.22 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | $-3.35 Million | $11.08 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2005 | -0.21x | $-2.23 Million | $10.52 Million | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2004 | 4.40x | $56.48 Million | $12.83 Million | ▲ +364.1% |
| 2003 | 0.95x | $8.06 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +752.7% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | $-1.54 Million | $10.62 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2001 | -0.20x | $-3.67 Million | $18.38 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2000 | -0.63x | $-8.28 Million | $13.12 Million | — |