Retractable Technologies Inc (RVP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Retractable Technologies Inc (RVP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-596.54K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($68.26 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Retractable Technologies Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Retractable Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Retractable Technologies Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore RVP total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Retractable Technologies Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Retractable Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Retractable Technologies Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | $-7.06 Million | $68.26 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2024 | -0.16x | $-11.56 Million | $73.55 Million | ▼ -556.5% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $2.77 Million | $80.38 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $16.77 Million | $104.21 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $32.79 Million | $113.98 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $19.00 Million | $55.09 Million | ▲ +171.7% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $2.19 Million | $17.29 Million | ▲ +218.7% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-1.20 Million | $11.18 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2017 | -0.27x | $-2.92 Million | $10.98 Million | ▼ -257.3% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | $-794.91K | $10.67 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2015 | -0.28x | $-3.25 Million | $11.51 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | $-3.87 Million | $18.52 Million | ▼ -243.8% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $2.93 Million | $20.20 Million | ▲ +991.9% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $158.34K | $11.90 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $5.51 Million | $10.11 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2010 | 0.61x | $8.73 Million | $14.29 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2009 | -0.68x | $-12.30 Million | $18.02 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | $-5.92 Million | $16.33 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2007 | -0.34x | $-4.22 Million | $12.57 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | $-3.35 Million | $11.08 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2005 | -0.21x | $-2.23 Million | $10.52 Million | ▼ -104.8% |
| 2004 | 4.40x | $56.48 Million | $12.83 Million | ▲ +364.1% |
| 2003 | 0.95x | $8.06 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +752.7% |
| 2002 | -0.15x | $-1.54 Million | $10.62 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2001 | -0.20x | $-3.67 Million | $18.38 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2000 | -0.63x | $-8.28 Million | $13.12 Million | — |