Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (TRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($76.66 Million) in one year. Check Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (TRX) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp across 28 annual periods. Check Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TRX cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $16.28 Million | $81.07 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2024 | 0.32x | $15.32 Million | $48.06 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $17.33 Million | $41.14 Million | ▲ +285.9% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $2.96 Million | $27.07 Million | ▲ +114.6% |
| 2021 | -0.75x | $-7.52 Million | $10.04 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2020 | -0.49x | $-6.60 Million | $13.36 Million | ▼ -170.9% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-3.60 Million | $19.77 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2018 | -0.10x | $-1.81 Million | $18.84 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-3.39 Million | $11.96 Million | ▼ -118.3% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | $-1.46 Million | $11.25 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | $-680.46K | $6.99 Million | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2014 | -2.48x | $-3.21 Million | $1.29 Million | ▼ -270.1% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | $-3.93 Million | $5.86 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-4.75 Million | $12.53 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2011 | -0.29x | $-3.21 Million | $11.17 Million | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2010 | -0.96x | $-2.37 Million | $2.47 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2009 | -3.68x | $-2.50 Million | $679.64K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2008 | -4.25x | $-2.48 Million | $583.18K | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2007 | -3.46x | $-2.35 Million | $678.89K | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2006 | -2.63x | $-1.88 Million | $713.29K | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2005 | -4.27x | $-1.63 Million | $382.54K | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2004 | -2.31x | $-1.81 Million | $785.38K | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2003 | -1.85x | $-1.48 Million | $799.37K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | $-944.54K | $838.39K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2001 | -1.25x | $-454.90K | $364.50K | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2000 | -0.57x | $-197.39K | $345.41K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1999 | -2.08x | $-423.50K | $203.18K | ▲ +86.2% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | $-804.66K | $53.31K | — |