Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (TRX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (TRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($76.66 Million) in one year. See Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $16.28 Million | $81.07 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2024 | 0.32x | $15.32 Million | $48.06 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $17.33 Million | $41.14 Million | ▲ +285.9% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $2.96 Million | $27.07 Million | ▲ +114.6% |
| 2021 | -0.75x | $-7.52 Million | $10.04 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2020 | -0.49x | $-6.60 Million | $13.36 Million | ▼ -170.9% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-3.60 Million | $19.77 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2018 | -0.10x | $-1.81 Million | $18.84 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-3.39 Million | $11.96 Million | ▼ -118.3% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | $-1.46 Million | $11.25 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | $-680.46K | $6.99 Million | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2014 | -2.48x | $-3.21 Million | $1.29 Million | ▼ -270.1% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | $-3.93 Million | $5.86 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-4.75 Million | $12.53 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2011 | -0.29x | $-3.21 Million | $11.17 Million | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2010 | -0.96x | $-2.37 Million | $2.47 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2009 | -3.68x | $-2.50 Million | $679.64K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2008 | -4.25x | $-2.48 Million | $583.18K | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2007 | -3.46x | $-2.35 Million | $678.89K | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2006 | -2.63x | $-1.88 Million | $713.29K | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2005 | -4.27x | $-1.63 Million | $382.54K | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2004 | -2.31x | $-1.81 Million | $785.38K | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2003 | -1.85x | $-1.48 Million | $799.37K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | $-944.54K | $838.39K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2001 | -1.25x | $-454.90K | $364.50K | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2000 | -0.57x | $-197.39K | $345.41K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1999 | -2.08x | $-423.50K | $203.18K | ▲ +86.2% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | $-804.66K | $53.31K | — |