Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (TRX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (TRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($76.66 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corp. Check TRX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $16.28 Million | $81.07 Million | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2024 | 0.32x | $15.32 Million | $48.06 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | $17.33 Million | $41.14 Million | ▲ +285.9% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $2.96 Million | $27.07 Million | ▲ +114.6% |
| 2021 | -0.75x | $-7.52 Million | $10.04 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2020 | -0.49x | $-6.60 Million | $13.36 Million | ▼ -170.9% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-3.60 Million | $19.77 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2018 | -0.10x | $-1.81 Million | $18.84 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | $-3.39 Million | $11.96 Million | ▼ -118.3% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | $-1.46 Million | $11.25 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2015 | -0.10x | $-680.46K | $6.99 Million | ▲ +96.1% |
| 2014 | -2.48x | $-3.21 Million | $1.29 Million | ▼ -270.1% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | $-3.93 Million | $5.86 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | $-4.75 Million | $12.53 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2011 | -0.29x | $-3.21 Million | $11.17 Million | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2010 | -0.96x | $-2.37 Million | $2.47 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2009 | -3.68x | $-2.50 Million | $679.64K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2008 | -4.25x | $-2.48 Million | $583.18K | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2007 | -3.46x | $-2.35 Million | $678.89K | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2006 | -2.63x | $-1.88 Million | $713.29K | ▲ +38.3% |
| 2005 | -4.27x | $-1.63 Million | $382.54K | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2004 | -2.31x | $-1.81 Million | $785.38K | ▼ -24.8% |
| 2003 | -1.85x | $-1.48 Million | $799.37K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | $-944.54K | $838.39K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2001 | -1.25x | $-454.90K | $364.50K | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2000 | -0.57x | $-197.39K | $345.41K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1999 | -2.08x | $-423.50K | $203.18K | ▲ +86.2% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | $-804.66K | $53.31K | — |