Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc (UAVS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc (UAVS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.40x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.49 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2003–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc across 23 annual periods. Also explore Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc (UAVS) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc (2003–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Ageagle Aerial Systems Inc (UAVS) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.53x | $-9.96 Million | $6.49 Million | ▼ -514.3% |
| 2024 | -0.25x | $-6.57 Million | $26.32 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2023 | -0.76x | $-10.96 Million | $14.46 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2022 | -1.83x | $-20.11 Million | $10.96 Million | ▼ -313.7% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-12.46 Million | $28.11 Million | ▲ +53.4% |
| 2020 | -0.95x | $-2.26 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +72.7% |
| 2019 | -3.48x | $-1.82 Million | $521.88K | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2018 | -5.92x | $-1.78 Million | $300.41K | ▼ -6889.9% |
| 2017 | -0.08x | $-1.24 Million | $14.66 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2016 | -0.08x | $-2.10 Million | $26.47 Million | ▼ -1199.5% |
| 2015 | -0.01x | $-148.68K | $24.37 Million | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $2.64 Million | $30.06 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $3.11 Million | $41.08 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $2.28 Million | $15.44 Million | ▲ +293.4% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-761.49K | $9.95 Million | ▼ -175.4% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $1.17 Million | $11.50 Million | ▼ -68.4% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | $3.69 Million | $11.47 Million | ▲ +842.0% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | $-408.49K | $9.43 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-408.49K | $9.43 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 2006 | -2.67x | $-1.44 Million | $537.10K | ▼ -1465.5% |
| 2005 | -0.17x | $-140.00K | $820.00K | ▼ -1231.7% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-10.00K | $780.00K | ▲ +67.9% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-30.00K | $750.00K | — |