Universal Security Instruments Inc (UUU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Security Instruments Inc (UUU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.80x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.59 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($3.23 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Universal Security Instruments Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Security Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Security Instruments Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore Universal Security Instruments Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Security Instruments Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Security Instruments Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see UUU market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.65 Million | ▼ -237.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $604.08K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $1.49 Million | $3.04 Million | ▲ +281.5% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | $-1.86 Million | $6.88 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2021 | 0.50x | $1.39 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +20042.7% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $9.25K | $3.73 Million | ▲ +239.2% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $5.87K | $8.03 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $534.88K | $6.15 Million | ▲ +116.8% |
| 2017 | -0.52x | $-2.15 Million | $4.16 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2016 | -0.39x | $-822.96K | $2.12 Million | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2015 | -1.19x | $-1.37 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2014 | -1.05x | $-851.94K | $810.56K | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2013 | -1.04x | $-785.73K | $752.99K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2012 | -2.90x | $-3.82 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -6303.1% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-67.17K | $1.48 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2010 | 2.02x | $5.03 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +407.7% |
| 2009 | -0.66x | $-2.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -408.8% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $2.35 Million | $11.04 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | $-3.17 Million | $11.52 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 2006 | 0.64x | $1.77 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +284.2% |
| 2005 | -0.35x | $-1.10 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -160.4% |
| 2004 | -0.13x | $-292.72K | $2.19 Million | ▼ -308.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-61.87K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2002 | -0.52x | $-779.74K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2001 | -0.39x | $-1.00 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2000 | -0.64x | $-905.44K | $1.41 Million | ▼ -589.1% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $316.10K | $2.42 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $486.84K | $2.96 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $1.45 Million | $4.36 Million | ▲ +867.3% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $206.75K | $6.00 Million | ▼ -87.3% |
| 1995 | 0.27x | $1.60 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +176.8% |
| 1994 | -0.35x | $-2.40 Million | $6.80 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 1993 | -0.32x | $-900.00K | $2.80 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 1992 | -0.71x | $-1.20 Million | $1.70 Million | — |