Universal Security Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Security Instruments Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Universal Security Instruments Inc (UUU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.80x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.59 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($3.23 Million) in one year. Check UUU cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Universal Security Instruments Inc (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Universal Security Instruments Inc from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Security Instruments Inc across 34 annual periods. Check UUU total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Universal Security Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
Universal Security Instruments Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Security Instruments Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Universal Security Instruments Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.65 Million | ▼ -237.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $604.08K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $1.49 Million | $3.04 Million | ▲ +281.5% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | $-1.86 Million | $6.88 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2021 | 0.50x | $1.39 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +20042.7% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $9.25K | $3.73 Million | ▲ +239.2% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $5.87K | $8.03 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $534.88K | $6.15 Million | ▲ +116.8% |
| 2017 | -0.52x | $-2.15 Million | $4.16 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2016 | -0.39x | $-822.96K | $2.12 Million | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2015 | -1.19x | $-1.37 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2014 | -1.05x | $-851.94K | $810.56K | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2013 | -1.04x | $-785.73K | $752.99K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2012 | -2.90x | $-3.82 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -6303.1% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-67.17K | $1.48 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2010 | 2.02x | $5.03 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +407.7% |
| 2009 | -0.66x | $-2.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -408.8% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $2.35 Million | $11.04 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | $-3.17 Million | $11.52 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 2006 | 0.64x | $1.77 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +284.2% |
| 2005 | -0.35x | $-1.10 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -160.4% |
| 2004 | -0.13x | $-292.72K | $2.19 Million | ▼ -308.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-61.87K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2002 | -0.52x | $-779.74K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2001 | -0.39x | $-1.00 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2000 | -0.64x | $-905.44K | $1.41 Million | ▼ -589.1% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $316.10K | $2.42 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $486.84K | $2.96 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $1.45 Million | $4.36 Million | ▲ +867.3% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $206.75K | $6.00 Million | ▼ -87.3% |
| 1995 | 0.27x | $1.60 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +176.8% |
| 1994 | -0.35x | $-2.40 Million | $6.80 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 1993 | -0.32x | $-900.00K | $2.80 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 1992 | -0.71x | $-1.20 Million | $1.70 Million | — |