Universal Security Instruments Inc (UUU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Security Instruments Inc (UUU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.80x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.59 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($3.23 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Universal Security Instruments Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Security Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Security Instruments Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore Universal Security Instruments Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Security Instruments Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Security Instruments Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Universal Security Instruments Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.65 Million | ▼ -237.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $604.08K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -66.5% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $1.49 Million | $3.04 Million | ▲ +281.5% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | $-1.86 Million | $6.88 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2021 | 0.50x | $1.39 Million | $2.78 Million | ▲ +20042.7% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $9.25K | $3.73 Million | ▲ +239.2% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $5.87K | $8.03 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $534.88K | $6.15 Million | ▲ +116.8% |
| 2017 | -0.52x | $-2.15 Million | $4.16 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2016 | -0.39x | $-822.96K | $2.12 Million | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2015 | -1.19x | $-1.37 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2014 | -1.05x | $-851.94K | $810.56K | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2013 | -1.04x | $-785.73K | $752.99K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2012 | -2.90x | $-3.82 Million | $1.32 Million | ▼ -6303.1% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-67.17K | $1.48 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2010 | 2.02x | $5.03 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +407.7% |
| 2009 | -0.66x | $-2.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -408.8% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | $2.35 Million | $11.04 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | $-3.17 Million | $11.52 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 2006 | 0.64x | $1.77 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +284.2% |
| 2005 | -0.35x | $-1.10 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -160.4% |
| 2004 | -0.13x | $-292.72K | $2.19 Million | ▼ -308.3% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-61.87K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2002 | -0.52x | $-779.74K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2001 | -0.39x | $-1.00 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2000 | -0.64x | $-905.44K | $1.41 Million | ▼ -589.1% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | $316.10K | $2.42 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $486.84K | $2.96 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $1.45 Million | $4.36 Million | ▲ +867.3% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $206.75K | $6.00 Million | ▼ -87.3% |
| 1995 | 0.27x | $1.60 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +176.8% |
| 1994 | -0.35x | $-2.40 Million | $6.80 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 1993 | -0.32x | $-900.00K | $2.80 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 1992 | -0.71x | $-1.20 Million | $1.70 Million | — |