Energy Fuels Inc (UUUU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Energy Fuels Inc (UUUU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($731.35 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Energy Fuels Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Energy Fuels Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Energy Fuels Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore UUUU year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Energy Fuels Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Energy Fuels Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see UUUU market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-89.48 Million | $729.28 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2024 | -0.66x | $-52.96 Million | $80.29 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2023 | -0.70x | $-15.94 Million | $22.73 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2022 | -1.68x | $-49.70 Million | $29.54 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2021 | -1.47x | $-29.29 Million | $19.92 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2020 | -1.25x | $-32.18 Million | $25.69 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | $-44.38 Million | $45.11 Million | ▼ -556.0% |
| 2018 | -0.15x | $-7.78 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2017 | -0.18x | $-10.34 Million | $58.07 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2016 | -0.21x | $-12.04 Million | $58.59 Million | ▼ -420.5% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | $-2.08 Million | $52.79 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | $-7.69 Million | $37.38 Million | ▼ -510.2% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-1.31 Million | $39.00 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | $-14.25 Million | $55.71 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2011 | -1.46x | $-3.79 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2010 | -2.93x | $-3.39 Million | $1.16 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2009 | -1.52x | $-2.57 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2008 | -1.15x | $-2.35 Million | $2.05 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 2007 | -3.24x | $-5.74 Million | $1.77 Million | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2006 | -4.65x | $-709.64K | $152.56K | ▼ -101.6% |
| 2005 | -2.31x | $-448.33K | $194.31K | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2004 | -1.27x | $-301.49K | $236.73K | ▼ -294.3% |
| 2003 | -0.32x | $-133.37K | $412.90K | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2002 | -0.25x | $-73.93K | $294.82K | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2001 | -0.54x | $-104.88K | $192.81K | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2000 | -0.60x | $-101.48K | $168.92K | — |