Energy Fuels Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Energy Fuels Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Energy Fuels Inc (UUUU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($731.35 Million) in one year. Check Energy Fuels Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Energy Fuels Inc (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Energy Fuels Inc from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Energy Fuels Inc across 26 annual periods. Check how high is Energy Fuels Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Energy Fuels Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Energy Fuels Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Energy Fuels Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Energy Fuels Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-89.48 Million | $729.28 Million | ▲ +81.4% |
| 2024 | -0.66x | $-52.96 Million | $80.29 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2023 | -0.70x | $-15.94 Million | $22.73 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2022 | -1.68x | $-49.70 Million | $29.54 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2021 | -1.47x | $-29.29 Million | $19.92 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2020 | -1.25x | $-32.18 Million | $25.69 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | $-44.38 Million | $45.11 Million | ▼ -556.0% |
| 2018 | -0.15x | $-7.78 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2017 | -0.18x | $-10.34 Million | $58.07 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2016 | -0.21x | $-12.04 Million | $58.59 Million | ▼ -420.5% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | $-2.08 Million | $52.79 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | $-7.69 Million | $37.38 Million | ▼ -510.2% |
| 2013 | -0.03x | $-1.31 Million | $39.00 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | $-14.25 Million | $55.71 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2011 | -1.46x | $-3.79 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2010 | -2.93x | $-3.39 Million | $1.16 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2009 | -1.52x | $-2.57 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2008 | -1.15x | $-2.35 Million | $2.05 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 2007 | -3.24x | $-5.74 Million | $1.77 Million | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2006 | -4.65x | $-709.64K | $152.56K | ▼ -101.6% |
| 2005 | -2.31x | $-448.33K | $194.31K | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2004 | -1.27x | $-301.49K | $236.73K | ▼ -294.3% |
| 2003 | -0.32x | $-133.37K | $412.90K | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2002 | -0.25x | $-73.93K | $294.82K | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2001 | -0.54x | $-104.88K | $192.81K | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2000 | -0.60x | $-101.48K | $168.92K | — |