Vista Gold Corporation (VGZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vista Gold Corporation (VGZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.44x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-526.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.20 Million) in one year. See VGZ free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vista Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vista Gold Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore Vista Gold Corporation (VGZ) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vista Gold Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vista Gold Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Vista Gold Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.37x | $-5.74 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -265.3% |
| 2023 | -1.47x | $-5.86 Million | $3.98 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2022 | -7.75x | $-7.41 Million | $957.00K | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2021 | -5.18x | $-10.62 Million | $2.05 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2020 | -5.04x | $-6.96 Million | $1.38 Million | ▼ -188.8% |
| 2019 | -1.75x | $-7.05 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2018 | -9.82x | $-8.57 Million | $872.00K | ▼ -129.7% |
| 2017 | -4.28x | $-8.80 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2016 | -4.64x | $-5.02 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2015 | 3.75x | $3.01 Million | $803.00K | ▲ +245.6% |
| 2014 | -2.57x | $-7.06 Million | $2.74 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2013 | -2.43x | $-24.52 Million | $10.08 Million | ▼ -155.9% |
| 2012 | -0.95x | $-30.16 Million | $31.72 Million | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2011 | -0.63x | $-24.99 Million | $39.38 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | $-8.67 Million | $24.14 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | $-7.88 Million | $26.09 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2008 | -0.32x | $-7.93 Million | $24.53 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2007 | -7.19x | $-4.99 Million | $694.00K | ▼ -1073.7% |
| 2006 | -0.61x | $-3.43 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2005 | -0.74x | $-3.38 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2004 | -0.66x | $-3.01 Million | $4.58 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.66x | $-3.01 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2002 | -0.54x | $-2.85 Million | $5.26 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | $-1.71 Million | $4.49 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2000 | -0.61x | $-2.80 Million | $4.56 Million | ▼ -167.4% |
| 1999 | -0.23x | $-1.72 Million | $7.51 Million | ▼ -159.5% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $10.61 Million | $27.54 Million | ▲ +558.9% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $23.90 Million | ▲ +122.1% |
| 1996 | -0.26x | $-3.72 Million | $14.08 Million | — |