Vista Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vista Gold Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Vista Gold Corporation (VGZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.44x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-526.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.20 Million) in one year. Check Vista Gold Corporation (VGZ) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Vista Gold Corporation (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Vista Gold Corporation from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Vista Gold Corporation across 29 annual periods. Check VGZ cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Vista Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Vista Gold Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vista Gold Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Vista Gold Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.37x | $-5.74 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -265.3% |
| 2023 | -1.47x | $-5.86 Million | $3.98 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2022 | -7.75x | $-7.41 Million | $957.00K | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2021 | -5.18x | $-10.62 Million | $2.05 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2020 | -5.04x | $-6.96 Million | $1.38 Million | ▼ -188.8% |
| 2019 | -1.75x | $-7.05 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2018 | -9.82x | $-8.57 Million | $872.00K | ▼ -129.7% |
| 2017 | -4.28x | $-8.80 Million | $2.06 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2016 | -4.64x | $-5.02 Million | $1.08 Million | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2015 | 3.75x | $3.01 Million | $803.00K | ▲ +245.6% |
| 2014 | -2.57x | $-7.06 Million | $2.74 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2013 | -2.43x | $-24.52 Million | $10.08 Million | ▼ -155.9% |
| 2012 | -0.95x | $-30.16 Million | $31.72 Million | ▼ -49.8% |
| 2011 | -0.63x | $-24.99 Million | $39.38 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | $-8.67 Million | $24.14 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2009 | -0.30x | $-7.88 Million | $26.09 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2008 | -0.32x | $-7.93 Million | $24.53 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2007 | -7.19x | $-4.99 Million | $694.00K | ▼ -1073.7% |
| 2006 | -0.61x | $-3.43 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2005 | -0.74x | $-3.38 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2004 | -0.66x | $-3.01 Million | $4.58 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.66x | $-3.01 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2002 | -0.54x | $-2.85 Million | $5.26 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | $-1.71 Million | $4.49 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 2000 | -0.61x | $-2.80 Million | $4.56 Million | ▼ -167.4% |
| 1999 | -0.23x | $-1.72 Million | $7.51 Million | ▼ -159.5% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $10.61 Million | $27.54 Million | ▲ +558.9% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $23.90 Million | ▲ +122.1% |
| 1996 | -0.26x | $-3.72 Million | $14.08 Million | — |