Movado Group Inc (MOV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Movado Group Inc (MOV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($252.01 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Movado Group Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Movado Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Movado Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Movado Group Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Movado Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Movado Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Movado Group Inc (MOV) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.01x | $-1.50 Million | $245.65 Million | ▼ -102.0% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | $76.78 Million | $250.12 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $54.34 Million | $277.16 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2022 | 0.46x | $130.81 Million | $284.07 Million | ▲ +94.8% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $68.41 Million | $289.32 Million | ▲ +133.6% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $32.07 Million | $316.90 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $86.17 Million | $259.32 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $54.72 Million | $175.04 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2017 | 0.44x | $58.42 Million | $133.81 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $74.59 Million | $144.02 Million | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2015 | 0.60x | $59.60 Million | $98.74 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | 0.48x | $54.52 Million | $112.62 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2013 | 0.39x | $38.78 Million | $100.67 Million | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2012 | 0.77x | $86.06 Million | $111.97 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $40.36 Million | $87.38 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $34.72 Million | $97.92 Million | ▲ +377.3% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-20.87 Million | $163.22 Million | ▼ -127.7% |
| 2008 | 0.46x | $83.63 Million | $181.16 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $67.83 Million | $198.79 Million | ▲ +173.8% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $28.44 Million | $228.21 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $30.19 Million | $160.39 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2004 | 0.44x | $51.65 Million | $116.25 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | $33.31 Million | $108.94 Million | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $16.55 Million | $118.21 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $25.27 Million | $130.94 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $28.27 Million | $119.37 Million | ▲ +338.7% |
| 1999 | -0.10x | $-12.90 Million | $130.00 Million | ▼ -68.5% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-6.10 Million | $103.60 Million | ▼ -261.9% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $3.80 Million | $104.50 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $3.90 Million | $95.60 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $6.80 Million | $94.00 Million | ▲ +2956.4% |
| 1994 | 0.00x | $200.00K | $84.50 Million | ▼ -97.2% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | $9.10 Million | $108.30 Million | — |