MasTec Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MasTec Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. MasTec Inc (MTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $88.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.51 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does MasTec Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of MasTec Inc (1986–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of MasTec Inc from 1986 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for MasTec Inc across 36 annual periods. Check MTZ cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
MasTec Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1986–2024)
MasTec Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1986 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MasTec Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MasTec Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | $1.12 Billion | $5.99 Billion | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $687.28 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $352.30 Million | $6.55 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $793.07 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $937.25 Million | $3.22 Billion | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $550.28 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $529.96 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +193.0% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $156.26 Million | $2.63 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $205.59 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $367.41 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $323.01 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $200.40 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $172.13 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +2327.0% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $5.83 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $218.03 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $124.14 Million | $835.29 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $58.18 Million | $647.81 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $68.70 Million | $395.87 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $46.21 Million | $339.10 Million | ▲ +399.1% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-18.43 Million | $404.56 Million | ▼ -489.8% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $4.83 Million | $412.87 Million | ▲ +107.3% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $2.23 Million | $394.69 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $56.97 Million | $348.25 Million | ▲ +32.7% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $54.81 Million | $444.57 Million | ▲ +582.5% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-11.87 Million | $464.55 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $120.10 Million | $471.60 Million | ▲ +1073.2% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-13.90 Million | $531.20 Million | ▼ -146.1% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $23.10 Million | $406.90 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | $37.40 Million | $379.50 Million | ▲ +110.7% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $5.60 Million | $119.70 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $3.60 Million | $91.60 Million | ▼ -95.1% |
| 1993 | 0.81x | $8.40 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +1994.4% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $2.90 Million | $75.20 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 1991 | 0.07x | $5.10 Million | $76.70 Million | ▼ -80.7% |
| 1987 | 0.34x | $29.30 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 1986 | 0.34x | $29.30 Million | $85.50 Million | — |