MasTec Inc (MTZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MasTec Inc (MTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $88.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.51 Billion) in one year. See MasTec Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
MasTec Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1986–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MasTec Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore MasTec Inc (MTZ) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MasTec Inc (1986–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MasTec Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MasTec Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | $1.12 Billion | $5.99 Billion | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $687.28 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $352.30 Million | $6.55 Billion | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $793.07 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $937.25 Million | $3.22 Billion | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $550.28 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $529.96 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +193.0% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $156.26 Million | $2.63 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $205.59 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $367.41 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $323.01 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $200.40 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $172.13 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▲ +2327.0% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $5.83 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $218.03 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $124.14 Million | $835.29 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $58.18 Million | $647.81 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $68.70 Million | $395.87 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $46.21 Million | $339.10 Million | ▲ +399.1% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-18.43 Million | $404.56 Million | ▼ -489.8% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $4.83 Million | $412.87 Million | ▲ +107.3% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $2.23 Million | $394.69 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $56.97 Million | $348.25 Million | ▲ +32.7% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $54.81 Million | $444.57 Million | ▲ +582.5% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-11.87 Million | $464.55 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $120.10 Million | $471.60 Million | ▲ +1073.2% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-13.90 Million | $531.20 Million | ▼ -146.1% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $23.10 Million | $406.90 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | $37.40 Million | $379.50 Million | ▲ +110.7% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $5.60 Million | $119.70 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $3.60 Million | $91.60 Million | ▼ -95.1% |
| 1993 | 0.81x | $8.40 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +1994.4% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $2.90 Million | $75.20 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 1991 | 0.07x | $5.10 Million | $76.70 Million | ▼ -80.7% |
| 1987 | 0.34x | $29.30 Million | $85.00 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 1986 | 0.34x | $29.30 Million | $85.50 Million | — |