Nordic American Tankers Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nordic American Tankers Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.74 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($445.32 Million) in one year. Check NAT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Nordic American Tankers Limited (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Nordic American Tankers Limited from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Nordic American Tankers Limited across 29 annual periods. Check NAT cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Nordic American Tankers Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Nordic American Tankers Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nordic American Tankers Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NAT cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $19.82 Million | $456.64 Million | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2024 | 0.42x | $128.16 Million | $308.77 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $139.44 Million | $340.89 Million | ▲ +477.6% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $24.13 Million | $340.75 Million | ▲ +156.2% |
| 2021 | -0.13x | $-44.46 Million | $352.93 Million | ▼ -142.6% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $110.94 Million | $375.22 Million | ▲ +143.6% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $52.86 Million | $435.48 Million | ▲ +453.6% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | $-16.10 Million | $469.08 Million | ▼ -146.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $31.74 Million | $430.00 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $127.79 Million | $478.86 Million | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2015 | 0.48x | $174.39 Million | $360.89 Million | ▲ +141.2% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $57.48 Million | $286.95 Million | ▲ +219.3% |
| 2013 | -0.17x | $-47.27 Million | $281.45 Million | ▼ -591.8% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-6.71 Million | $276.24 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2011 | -0.05x | $-12.16 Million | $257.82 Million | ▼ -108.3% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $50.97 Million | $90.13 Million | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2009 | 3.58x | $44.77 Million | $12.49 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2008 | 5.06x | $127.90 Million | $25.29 Million | ▲ +701.2% |
| 2007 | 0.63x | $83.65 Million | $132.52 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2006 | 0.57x | $106.61 Million | $188.23 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | $51.06 Million | $134.97 Million | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2004 | 26.90x | $62.82 Million | $2.34 Million | ▲ +2706.7% |
| 2003 | 0.96x | $29.89 Million | $31.19 Million | ▲ +142.3% |
| 2002 | 0.40x | $12.75 Million | $32.23 Million | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2001 | 1.18x | $36.27 Million | $30.82 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2000 | 0.81x | $24.26 Million | $30.04 Million | ▲ +102.6% |
| 1999 | 0.40x | $11.99 Million | $30.08 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $12.78 Million | $30.72 Million | ▲ +768.7% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $56.57K | $1.18 Million | — |